The story and art style definitely seem cool and interesting, but the long, dull, uninspired battle scenes drag on too much, and the sound effects just don’t make sense. Swords whooshing sound like transformers, and it’s all so exagerated, it’s off-putting. Don’t waste your time, this show isn’t worth it.
Trying so hard to GoT.
Yet another Hollywood Me-Too brainwashing. Never seen a series that tried that hard to avoid including men in main roles or portray men in secondary roles as weak buffoons who are at the mercy of the all powerful queens (talk about the stereotypical man they portray in the queen) and sorcerers. Even the hero of the story, who's supposed to have been born with no feelings, fell to the mercy of the beautiful sorcerer who also happens to be of Indian descent. However, unlike other brainwashing series that are also badly produced and acted (like that joke "Watchmen"), those of us with a brain big enough to laugh at the brainwashing attempt and ignore it can enjoy some aspect of this series. Hopefully, as Hollywood understands that misandry is falling out of fashion, future seasons will drop the brainwashing and focus on the quality of storytelling.
Too much focus on the female characters, not enough on the Witcher. I wish fems would stop rewriting popular male IP with the fem-agenda and do their own stuff.
I really liked the show in story/VFX/CGI/choreography wise. But for the good sake of Triss Merigold and Yeneffer, I shall downvote this show on every platform I can. Hopefully one day such productions can learn to pick the right actors for the character.
I wish I could give it a 10 (which I very very rarely do) -Season one is excellent in every aspect but one:
The timeline is blurry and confusing as f***.
Events taking place decades apart are only put into their place by a character dropping that something happened three decades ago in passing.
Normally that wouldn't be an issue, but most characters don't age!
I am still a bit confused as to why the bard doesn't age, since he seems to be human (I'm at Episode 6, so I hope they do explain it in one of the last episodes, but I doubt it)
That combinations makes it really hard to keep track of what happened before, what happened after and what happens at the same time.
P.S.: I don't know the books, so I have no idea if they had the same problems.
I took a look at the descriptions for the books though and some elements seem to coincide with the first prequel book. So I assume they are meshing prequel and original books together somehow.
new timeline, Different from book.
things that happen with 100 years between are now at the same time
i love when a show is obviously written by a feminist cause you can just see so many details and passion, like if someone rage rating this tv show low, you know he aint the one would respect woman's power
added: the ones commented below me already proved it
I can't make to episode 2. It's so boring, full of cliches and shallow characters. Never read the books. Never played the game. Didn't like what i saw. It's kind of pathetic and tacky.
Some people are making a fuss that the timeline is confusing. Since this is the internet it gets blown out of proportion. You get a clear hint in one episode this is happening and its easy to figure it out afterwards. That being said, just watch it! It´s really good!
Play the games, avoid the show.
It's so bad I don't know where to start...
The timeline is kinda confusing at first but you can figure it out later on, it could have been portrayed so much better but that's the least of this show's problems.
It presumes that viewers have read the books or played the games and so many things are left unexplained about the magic and history of this world and the way it all works.
I like these type of shows/movies and had high hopes for this one but now I don't think i'll bother watching season 2...
As a big fan of both the games and the novels, I was quite disappointed in this attempt at adapting the world of the Witcher.
This is a world that is vast and filled with ancient history, which makes it a huge endeavor to make people care for it on a TV show. In that specific regard, I regard the show as a huge failure. We're thrown into the world knowing very little, which leaves us with characters emoting about places and events we have no emotional connection to.
It doesn't help that the chronology is a total bloody mess. Why the creators decided it was a good idea to tell three different stories stretched across 50+ years without clearly informing the viewer, I'll never know. I could follow because I read the novels, but as an introduction for someone unfamiliar with the world, it's an awful decision.
Compare this to two massive fantasy adaptations that succeeded at making us care:
Game of Thrones started small, showing us the people of Winterfell, then introducing the visiting Baratheons and Lannisters. It made us care about the world of Westeros by first showing us compelling characters, then slowly expanding the stakes to encompass the entire world.
Lord of the Rings had the most epic world-building in arguably the whole genre's history, but again it started small. It made us care about a quaint Hobbit village long before it was time to venture into the greater world.
The Witcher does nothing of this. As a result, when we're shown the massive battle for Cithra in the first episode, it's hard to care even if you're familiar with the setting. It's all just noise and pointless gore.
This tragic misfire carries on throughout the rest of the show. Before we get to experience how awesome Yennefer is, we get to experience her as a misfit whose only apparent redeeming quality is her hunger for power. Geralt himself is interesting from the get-go, but he's all too serious to be sympathetic, at least until Jaskier shows up.
And so, we're left with characters emoting and chewing scenery. It's pretty scenery, sure: the VFX is nice, and the fight scenes are pretty great. But none of this feels lived-in and compelling the way Lord of the Rings was from its very first minutes. The dialogues tend to be arch and clichéd, and the whole affair lacks the subtle realism of Game of Thrones.
And so, as much as I love the characters of the Witcher, I'll continue to look to the novels and the games as the more definitive versions. This is a brave attempt, but as much as it aspires to be top-shelf fantasy TV, it's second-rate at best.
There's one moment where the TV series shone bright: the striga fight. This had all the markings of what made the Witcher stories great, and it was genuinely terrifying and exhilarating. This makes me think that the first season would have been much, much better if it didn't try to build the entire world across a century of conflict, and instead focused on the adventures of Geralt of Rivia as he hunts monsters. Ciri and Yennefer could have been introduced a bit later, and their backgrounds explored in season 2, when we would all be on board for the ride.
As much as it deviates from the novels, I'd recommend The Witcher 3 as the ultimate interpretation of that world. surpsassing even the novels.
I did not read the books, and I did not play any of the games (although I heard at least one of the games is of great quality in storytelling) so I went into this show more or less a blank slate.
And boy it is bad.... The writing is just dreadful. I think the writers assumed prior knowledge to the world and characters, and lean on that assumption too heavily.
From the very beginning it is poorly written. Timelines are messy and unclear, exposition is done terribly, worldbuilding looked like an afterthought and taken from a first draft, the pacing is all over the place and inconsistent over time as well inconsistent for each subplot. Episode structure is even irratic. They presented us a continuous story, but several episodes focused more on little episodic adventures that did not impact the main storyline all that much. And for a show with only 8 episodes, that is deadly and lead to other stories being rushed or simply put on hold for the next season (I assume.)
Toward the middle of the show, it started to get a bit better and I thought it could be promising after a bit rocky start, but in the end they could not deliver and it turned into an utter and complete trainwreck (oh that last episode, I almost fell out of my chair several times from disbelieve.) Rushed plot resolutions, while other characters stories crawled to a complete standstill with close to no progression or character development, in somecases even for the whole season.
What the show does have going for it: Photography, sets and costume design are beautiful!
I really did not want to dislike this, but it looked like they actively tried to make me stop watching.
Note: This review is about season 1.
Way too many details about the female characters and not so many (if any ) for Geralt. Focus on the main character Netflix at first,not the other way round. Other than that I enjoyed it and I believe that here we have a gem that will grow over time, season by season.
So I've have to say I've thoroughly enjoyed this, even though I kept getting interrupted. So I may have enjoyed it more if left alone.
I also enjoyed the ps4 game although I hear this was based on the books, which I'm not going to read but I will definitely go back to the game and complete it finally.
But I must say I had a very hard time reminding myself that I was watching Geralt of Rivia "The White Wolf" and his love interest Yennefer, and not Michael Moorcock's Elric of Melniboné "The White Wolf" and his love interest Cymoril.
In which the latter was written 1st.
A complete rip? Maybe/maybe not, Influenced/inspired by Moorcock's creation? Most definitely.
Well the story lines may be a little different in places but the similarities in character looks as well as in many other aspects are uncanny.
I do have to say clearly it is very possible that two people could create two very similar ideas with very symmetrical visions. Even I myself have come up with ideas before that then one day I've seen someone make into a movie or show that felt like it were ripped straight from my head. But who knows, we probably never will.
Judge for yourself by reading the books, googling it or just wait for the supposed Elric series that's supposed to be coming out.
"Fingers crossed it gets a high budget and doesn't get put to shame by this one".
Oh yeah and if you're gonna play around with the whole time jumping thing please do give us the date or a better clue or something.
For example 1 min Geralt could have his renowned scar and the next min he doesn't have his scar, simple.
Definitely binge watch otherwise you might feel you missed an episode or think you forgot something.
And yes yes Elric is my namesake, thanx for that one Dad.......
Oh okay. New season when?
It's official, The Witcher season 4 is in production. But that's not all, we're already planning season 5, which will be the final season
Oh No!
Anyway.
I'm a big witcher fan and the first two seasons were pretty good. Sadly Laura is a **** with no respect for witcher fans or the source material. I
This could've been a real gem.
Woke propaganda. Trans and homosexuality promotion.
Only watched the first season. It never felt like there was a big overarching story that I like in my fantasy shows. Never had the interest to go back to the second season, especially not when I heard that Cavill left the show.
Season 3 was one of the worst seasons of anything I've ever seen, and I'd watched Season 2 so that's quite the achievement.
I only started watching this show because my husband asked me to. (He’s a gamer, I’m definitely not). The first two seasons were tolerable enough for someone who doesn’t love fantasy TV (hi, hello, it’s me); but then we heard that Henry Cavill is leaving after the third season, and we both stopped caring to watch at all. He is the best part of this series, hands down.
Only episode one of the first two seasons were worth watchng. Everything else was lazy writing which made no sense. And had lot of woke crap. These writers shouldnt be given another project in their life. This could've been the next game of thrones but we got something worse than a cw show.
First and second season were great. The third is a mess. Abandoning the source material, antagonizing the lead actor and the fans… that leads to a disaster.
Tris Merigold is described in the books as a red-haired woman with pale skin and green eyes. She is often dressed in red or purple robes and has a slim figure. Her appearance is described as very attractive, and she has a confident and charismatic air.
You couldn't have cast the person more wrongly in the series. Probably, the choice fell on this miscast only because of the "wokeness".
Stopped watching after Season2. What a shame what they did.
JFC what a downfall. I was not the biggest fan of S01 and S02 but it was on ok watch .. but wtf happend in S03. The writers must be completely braindead. Very happy for Henry that he was able to get out of this.
Sadly, this show has declined recently. It's run by incompotent EP's and Season 4 has the chance to be one of the WORST seasons of television to ever disgrace the silver screen. Was smart of Henry to jump out of this particular dumpster bin.
This had so much potential!!! They got the budget for sure :type_4:but shit is messy af. I imagine this would have been different if HBO adapted it. What can I say they're JUST damn good at adapting/making adult shows :100:.
Rating:
Characters:3/5
plot:3.5/5
Character Progression:2/5
Storytelling:1/5
Overall:7.5/10
Storytelling;
Whoever is doing the fucking storylines/storytelling needs to be fucking fired. This could have been the next Game of Thrones easily if it had masterpiece storytelling. The Storylines are all over the place. I understand in S1 they're trying something unique and structuring the timeline like the fucking book. It held my attention but from there it went downhill real quick.
This atrocious storytelling is nuts :skull:. They give you the sense of a huge dreadful event coming and some characters just jumping in for the action aka Ciri. This is where the storytelling comes into play!!. This is what moves the villains and heroes as they interact with the plot.
In this, The Witcher fails terribly. The characters pop up and do something that you'd not give a fuck about. A villain comes, demands to have the girl and kills other people. That's IT:type_1_2:♂.
Character Progression;
OMG, this is the downer for me :100::expressionless:. In season 1, they at least did something resembling character progression/development and only 2 characters at that :rolling_eyes: Yen and Geralt. That's it. From there on out, nobody else gets characterization and this is what GOT excelled at. In GOT you would encounter fans divided when you ask “who their favourite character is?”. And that's :100::100: phenomenal characterization/progression/development/arc. In The Witcher, all you get is people yapping about Henry Cavill. And that should tell you something about the other characters :unamused:.
Finishing S3 and I'm done with it. I'll indulge myself with the books:wave:. Read The Last Wish and it's more promising than this shit show :100:.
The show has moments of greatness. The world of the Witcher, the characters, and the story are very interesting. However, this show plays like a summarization of the actual story. I wish that was actually presented before the show started. Instead you get a "based on "The Witcher" series" amidst the end credits. That is very "loosely" based as is clearly evident. Like many Hollywood adaptions, this one falls short. If you're looking to fill in all of the gaps, then please check out the novels by Polish author Andrzej Sapkowski.
Am I the only one who thought that the last season was supremely confusing and quite badly written? The first season was epic. Second was meh. The third was dog shit. I'm done with this show. I can see why Henry Cavill was pissed.
I am not sure to watch s3 since s1 the show as so much decline and the comments are not really encouraging
Season 1-excellent, Season 2- so-so, Season 3- gave up after ep.3, its become mundane, slow and boring with nothing to hold ones interest, or excite. Started out with great promise that slowly fizzled out from midway thru season 2......Pity.
If you enjoy good storytelling, quality world building and interesting characters you will not find anything of the sort in this show.
A really good show that can be hard to follow at times I will say, but it still somehow kept my attention. While the future of this series is uncertain, the first two seasons are very good themselves, and if you are a fan of the video game, you might also like this.
I LOVE THE WITCHER SO SO MUCH I don’t know why but I’m sooo drawn to geralt and cirilla’s (father/daughter) relationship and dynamic ugjwjhdjshdjdjc
Visuals/Cinematography: 8/7 ("elves" and humanoid creatures 1-4)
Dialog: 2-6 (uneven, and pathetic given they had the source material and author)
Characters: 1-6 (abomination)
An absolute abortion of the source material, and a travesty of the depth, nuance, and mystery (and romance!) of the characters of Yennefer and Geralt, which immediately bastardized the setup of Geralt and Ciri-- which was the most poignant thing I've read in my life -- and was the heart of the entire series, and something which can not be fixed.
Just read the books, or listen to the wonderful audiobooks' narration by Peter Kenney, if listening in English. The Polish audiobook performances are beyond amazing, and exceed anything I've heard in English, though I won't have the pleasure of understanding it.
===
And yes, Cavill is a great actor, but he still wasn't given a chance by Hissrich and the writers to show even a Glimmer of who the real character of Geralt is. I still personally didn't like him in the role, but that could have been overcome if the showrunners had had any respect for or understanding of the characters and how good writing and narrative work. They are, however, complete hacks and lying hypocrites for saying that they would do a straight adaptation instead of massively inferior spitball rework fanfic, which is what this actually is, put in the kindest of terms.
Haven't read the books.
From my perspective, the show is pretty good; watchable, at least. The first season is better than the second from every point of view. The show is called 'The Witcher', but it seems to give exponentially more importance to side characters as it goes along towards season 2. Another thing that I noticed is that it has quite a few nudges at contemporary society for a dark-medieval story. At some point, you realize that the writers don't seem to understand the world of the narrative with some dialogues that they add to the show.
A lot of side show, too much woke for my taste, and not enough 'the witcher' in The Witcher. Good to watch once, easily forgettable.7/10
"The Witcher" is a standalone TV show, and it doesn't matter if it is an accurate transposition of the original novels or the video games. Despite that, "mixed feelings" is the best way I could describe it.
The overall atmosphere and characters are fine, but it felt that the storytelling was a little messy. First of all, the lore from the books is never explained despite being far from obvious, leaving most casual viewers disoriented. Names and locations are also hard to remember, with the show doing literally nothing to help you remember the essential information. They just go on with everything assuming we all took the necessary history classes. I played the video games some years ago but still couldn't figure out a lot of the dynamics. The three main storylines are supposed to intertwine but are not temporally parallel. Ciri has to find Geralt, but the other characters just travel aimlessly waiting for the mandatory intersection. Fights are well choreographed but also mixed with cheap CGI at times. Much of the talking is sloppy, although the humor positively reminded me of "Hercules: The Legendary Journeys".
The second season showed off better production value, but ended up being even more slow-paced than the first. I am sure they could have told the same story in a couple of hours. While "vertical" self-contained episodes like the first one were quite fun, I couldn't care less about the overarching narrative. At times it was hard to follow the plot and grasp the characters' motivations because they would keep changing for random reasons. Or maybe I should say, the show fails at keeping you focused long enough to keep all characters and lore details in mind?
Deff prefer the 2nd season over the first but still good
I love sci-fi and fantasy and this is a great show. It follows the video game pretty decently, which I also thought was entertaining. I really like this show so far!
First season story got fucked by the jumbled timeline, otherwise it would've scored a :100:
The cast is perfect, same with the sceneries and visuals.
Edit: 2nd season, I just keep falling in love with Yennefer more and more after each episode, god I love her... Anyway, they did a great job in rectifying their previous mistake with the storytelling.
The story is finally starting to take shape and I'm all excited for a 3rd season, Lets gooo !
Should watch season 1 a couple of times before understanding the confusing timelines, however it pays off, season 2 was amazing and all he characters are so lovable. Great acting and writing, definitely one of my favorite series of all time.
It's sad when some minorities who are not minorities at all insist on getting some roles that do not fit them at all, just because they otherwise have to cut the racism track ..... That kind of pisses me off. Why does Jennefer have to be played by an Indian? Why Triss from a Turkish / Arab woman (what do I know)? Why is Fringilla played by a black woman? These are all roles these actors don't fit into. Something like that is done again and again, just because otherwise one would be accused of racism. Something like that is just poor. I, of Jewish descent, would never insist on playing a Nazi in a film about World War II. The actors also have to fit the role. The new trend, where actors want to have all sorts of roles these days, even though they don't fit, and you usually come across the racism streak, is just questionable and sucks
the 1st season was barely watchable, but this is as much as I can suffer this woke shit...its basically a diversity fest with a constant attempt to portray a oppressor-oppressed narrative...
As it was mentioned before countless times, first season is so bad for someone who's not familiar with books or games, I just couldn't make myself start watching second season
Unfaithful to the source material. You'll probably enjoy it better if you've never read the books. It honestly feels like all of the nuance had to be removed from the story because the writers thought the viewers would be too dumb to get it. I have no hope of further seasons being better since they've already changed so much...
I feel like I'm the only person who absolutely loved the changes they made in season 2 compared to the books! I hated the books, dragged myself all the way to 50% of Lady of the Lake and then finally gave up because I was so disinterested for the last 3 books. I do miss the connection Ciri and Yen have in the books but the show made the world more interesting with the addition of new monsters and monoliths!
Season 1 was fine. They did interesting things with the timelines (which were a tad unnecessarily confusing) and they had some decent political intrigue and fun "short story" episodic plots. It tied up fairly neatly at the end.
Season 2 was pretty great. A lot of dangling threads are introduced in the first 4 episodes in very frustrating ways and most of them are tied up incredibly neatly in the final two. There's a lot more focus on the characters and this is primarily Ciri's story, not Geralt's or Yennefer's though they do have major roles to play. Jaskier comes in the clutch to deliver some much needed levity and pulls it off with some great scenes. Music is as good as always
I hope they end it at a neat and tidy Season 3. I'm not sure if they will considering the popularity but I still want it to be something they round off by the end of the next season in a bow all gift wrapped with a solid conclusion.
I would prefer it if Ciri wouldn't exist in the Witcher universe. The character breaks the whole immersion for me and everytime I see her, I take the show and story less serious. Besides that, it's a really good show.
Season 3 update: I can't imagine this series without Henry Cavill as the titular character (no shade to Liam Hemsworth who is scheduled to pick up the mantle in season 4). Henry Cavill is not only to be applauded for his presence in the role or in fixing the mental imprint of the character in the minds and imaginations of the fans >sigh< but for his desire to remain faithful to the source material of the series. One can't help but wonder how adrift it will become once he leaves the field. I watched this season with bittersweet nostalgia thinking it may be the end of an era. This series will always be about the interplay of the characters and chemistry is hard to replicate. Otherwise my review remains unchanged from my initial impressions.
I’ve watched 2 seasons of THE WITCHER, now, and I find it a compelling series. You just have to wade through a lot of nudity, sexuality and become chummy with the f-bomb (all unnecessary for anything but the gratuitous building a young audience). I was a little annoyed by the anachronistic vocabulary and ideologies but the story arc, the relationships, the dogged ethic of Witcher and the moral dilemmas and redemptive arc of the main characters won me over. Definitely not for all audiences, but for me, I rate it an 8 (compelling) out of 10. [Fantasy Adventure]
S2 felt boring and i lost interest.
Season 2 managed to make this show even better in my opinion. Hope they keep coming.
I barely have any words, this is so epic! Sorry Game of Thrones but you are no longer sitting on the throne! This is far way better! I just love everything about The Witcher! EPIC!
My review for The Witcher developed as the show went:
Episode 1 - A great introducion to the show with well balanced plot lines.
Episode 2 - A terrible follow up to the previous episode with uninteresting characters and plot lines outside of Geralt and Ciri. A little bit of a fall off in the writing, some segments felt cheap/cringe.
Episode 3 - A mixed experience. This episode shines with the Geralt segments and is far better than episode 2, however, a lot of miscasts in this episode and also where that feeling of miscast begins to develop more. Geralt and Ciri are excellent castings, Ciri in some ways less. So far, Yennefer and Triss are some of the worst castings I've seen in a show.
Episode 4 - Makes up for the last two episodes, actually a really good episode and experience. Here was where I realised there was a time gap and was a little confused. Had to google to figure it out, wish the show addressed this for people that tried to understand by watching. This misunderstanding probably leaves some to dislike this episode to hell and back, needs a firm grasp of the timeline.
Episode 5 - Things start to heat up with this episode, also one of the best so far I think. Really felt faithful Witcher vibes in this episode, Yennefer and Geralt's chemistry work as well as it does in any other Witcher adaptation, which is good. I like the direction the show is starting to go in, hope it can hold out like this for the last three episodes. Still, the casting of Yennefer still bugs me, but the casting choice is starting to grow on me a little, although in some bits I just don't see it, but it is what it is
Episode 6-8 - These episodes were so good, I watched all three in one sitting. 6 was unique in it's own way, I really liked the concept for this episode and the emotional impact coupled with the subtle messages. Seeing emotional Geralt was a treat, especially in this way. Also feel bad for my boy Jaskier at the end. Episodes 7 and 8 may as well be considered the same episodes since they flow so well into each other. I really loved them both and I think they're the peak of the show. Everything was amazing in these final two episodes, and that ending with Geralt and Ciri perfectly captured their relationship. I felt the same sense of emotion and care for Geralt and Ciri as I did the moment they were reunited in The Witcher 3. Can't wait to see Season 2 because of this, it's going to be fucking awesome.
I loved the Witcher 3, and I loved this show in addition. Might read the books, but one thing is certain, I'm hell bent on getting a white cat with yellow eyes with the purpose to call it Geralt.
It has a confusing storyline at the start but once you realise the timelines then it will make sense. A nice set up for a future season.
I love this series of the best that I watch.
Okay. I've watched this in its entirety, twice and I still haven't got a fucking "scooby" what's going on.
I hope season 2 is more coherent.
Only 5 minutes long? Please correct that.
The Witcher is own of those shows where you either dig it or you don't. I lean towards the latter.
It's not that I say it's an awful show. No, the production value for a TV show is actually well above average. Yet, I got nothing out of it. Having never played the games or read a book I dropped into a world I knew nothing about. The plot starts without any explanation or background, and while I try to figure out this world, new elements are added and I can't make sense of who is who ?
Then there is the different timelines which present a problem because people don't age accordingly. Which I could explain to myself by assuming a year in this world is different from a real one. It's a fantasy tale after all. But I also wonder if it was really nessessary to present the story like this instead of just linear.
As I mentioned production itself is very good. Henry Cavill carries this thing on his shoulders with a lot of help from Anya Chalotra.
I'm not a fanatsy fan in particular so maybe this just isn't something for me. This being only the first chapter in the tale, it is also entirely possible many things will make sense later on.
Right now, after finishing the first season, I am asking myself if I do want to know.
Throwing you in at the deep end with a confusing timeline and lack of focus, The Witcher suffers because of this but also has a range of great characters that keep it interesting throughout.
It would have been better had they specified the different time period they were showing instead of letting you try and guess. Otherwise great serious.
Well I have an obsession for the witcher from the games and the books. I did not have any trouble understanding the timelines. I enjoyed it a lot. You have to understand that season 1 is all about the introduction of the characters. But still they did a pretty good job. Not as good as I expected but I will hold that thought for now and hope that season 2 will make season 1 worth it.
Good show related to the game Witcher.
I haven't seen the books and j haven't played the games which I think amounts to my confusion at this show. it's told in three different timelines with three different main characters and the show does nothing to help you understand what is going on. I feel like, dare I say, they filmed these different episodes and then played a bit of pot luck to decide which order they were going in. The episodes didn't link up in the traditional way and I understand that this can sometimes be a good thing but it just didn't work for me here.
The characters and acting were good though so thats a plus. I feel like this is one of those shows where, when it comes out, I'll watch the second season to cement how I feel about the show in general because with just this preliminary season I'm not overly impressed.
Mediocre on all the fronts.
What a waste of my time and the great fund to this series!! I didn't like the go and back between the past and present.. i didn't love any of the characters.
I hope this season is just making the way for greater seasons to come although I don't think so
1/10
Netflix sucked again. Thanks to the Social Justice Warriors, they sucked on a good thing AGAIN. I love Witcher Universe. I red the books played the games and with that I can easily say the series sucks. It’s not connected with the gists of the Witcher Universe. Thanks to the feminism and niggaism they didn’t keep on even the real story. They put niggas to the unnecessary roles. There are already black characters in the Witcher Universe, why do you put them to unnecessary places? Are they work for cheaper money? They made noble really perfect. In the Witcher Universe, the author have the laugh on nobles, but the movie they die aristocratically. Enough for licking a:asterisk_symbol::asterisk_symbol::asterisk_symbol::asterisk_symbol: Netflix enough. Oh I almost forgot the feminism. For that look at the woman characters in the books than at the series. So in nutshell, this movie sucks f:asterisk_symbol::asterisk_symbol::asterisk_symbol: Netflix and Social Justice Warriors.
1/10
I found the show enjoyable overall, but most certainly flawed. It adapts material from the first two books, taking a good amount of liberties in certain areas. Now, I was fine with them making changes, but felt some of them certainly were for the worse. To begin with, the timeline is completely messed up. They wanted to give the story a POV type of thing, following each of the 3 main characters separately, which had me confused for half of the show. There are jumps in time all the time. I genuinely believe that it would have been better if they had just had the story move chronologically.
The POV brings forth another issue, pacing. The most interesting parts to watch were certainly Geralt's, adapted straight from the book. They were adapted pretty well, though a bit rushed at times. It is understandable why they showed Yen and Ciri's stories, though I think that if they had their own separate episodes, the show would have fared better. It leaves a very disjointed feel to the whole story, moving between classic Geralt stories, the weird Yennefer ones and that of Ciri.
Speaking of Geralt, Henry Cavill is the perfect actor to play Geralt. Within a few episodes, he became my default version of the character. I experienced immense enjoyment just watching him be Geralt, there are a lot of subtleties he completely nails, while giving it his own flavour. My other favourite casting choice was Julian, Geralt's troubadour companion. The actor portrays his witty, cynical, comedic relief aspects lovingly well and he is a pretty darn good singer to boot.
The actress of Yennefer does a good job. They show her development from the start to the woman she becomes, which was interesting. There were some weird parts here. I will give it to this way of presenting the story, it makes the mage characters a lot more interesting from the start here.
Now, I have some more issues with Ciri. They missed what the execution in the books had, mainly the connection between Geralt and Ciri. They have the theme of destiny connecting them, but it feels more unsatisfying and contrived. They set up the hunt from her and her powers much earlier, I hope it doesn't lead to the show feeling repetitive later. I just wish they didn't feel so much like a plot device and more like a human being. She is a rowdy tomboy, they only hinted at this once.
Visually, the show looks good. Cinematography is fine, not outstanding, but fine. The CGI is mostly okay, but it has some horrible spots. Fight scenes are amazing, maybe overchoreographed at times, though that is nitpicky.
Loved the music for the show. I was surprised how good it was even. As a person that spent time with all 3 games, each one of which always had an outstanding soundtrack, I wondered how the show would live up to that. It did it excellently. The sound is different from that of the games, but feels very much like the Witcher. Particular fan of the theme of Yennefer and the Toss A Coin For Your Witcher.
All in all, The Witcher is a good show. The first 2 books are in a different format that the other books, being short story collections rather than novels. There was obviously an attempt to streamline the former into the latter to make it more serialised, yet I feel those 2 books make for great TV just the way they are. Episodic with hints of continuity. I have hope there will be improvements in the next season, so I am waiting eagerly.
Edit: As time has passed, I've grown to dislike the show somewhat more. As it is, it is enjoyable, though heavily flawed. It largely butchers the material from the first two books, even though it's arguably the best material to adapt for a TV series. I've changed my rating from a 7 to a 6 and edited out a few parts I don't agree with any more, but my thoughts are mostly the same, I've just realised I felt pressured to give it a higher score so I wouldn't be one of those "the books are better" people, but I think it is perfectly fair to criticise a show when it neither does anything particularly unique with its concept, nor does it do its source material justice.
great potentiel, but NETFLIX the does content not great tv show there a re a lot that dont make sense the cadrage the sound effect the cgi ( for fair domparaison go back to 2004). It s great if u have shit to do and u dont look the screen if no it can be really painful to watch. Henry cavill act great on only good point.
Hands down one of my favorite shows, and it is only one season. Yes it took some getting used to with the timeline, but even so it is worth ANYONE checking out. Cavill does a phenomenal job portraying Geralt Of Rivia, so much so that I don't anyone else even attempting the role. The season features action, surprises, occasional comedy, etc. Something for everyone.
Slow character development, really difficult to keep track of what’s going on, poor storytelling format, great soundtrack, the only characatets I felt invested in were Gerald and Jasmine, because of his witty remarks! Something is missing and I can’t quite put my hand on it. The latter episodes were a bit more interesting but then again the timeline was very difficult to follow.
In two words: Super disappointing.
♪ Toss a coin to yer witcher—
It's a pity that they didn't take advantage of it being a TV series to add a few more details to the world building and the characters' arcs. The storytelling was rocky, not very convincing. Although I didn't mind the timeline jumps, they could've been done better. The pacing felt a lil off and each character’s arcs were distinctly different in tone, significantly undermined the sense of cohesiveness.
Not horrible but definitely has plenty of room for improvement.
That said, bring on Season 2 because I'd still be interested to check it out.
I love this show, very well made and the videogame is one of my all time faves! Can't wait for S2! Henry truly embodies Geralt!
Season 1 has been good. The switching between present and past made the story - at times - hard to follow and even downright confusing. Had that been done in a better way, to make it much more clear it were jumps back and forward in time - the story most likely would have made more sense.
I still really enjoyed the show. Hopefully season 2 will follow soon.
If you want to hear the word "destiny" a lot then this show is for you. Otherwise watch episodes 2, 4, 5 and 6 and forget about the rest.
Do I need to have any background knowledge before I watch this show? I'm episode 5 and I don't understand much of what is going on.
I loved this show a lot and can’t wait for season two. Only gripe is it doesn’t do a good job of distinguishing past from present. Took me till episode 3 or 4 to realize I was looking at two different timelines.
Maybe I expected the wrong thing, something like LOTR or GOT but The Witcher is more like a children's fantasy movie, like The Chronicles of Narnia, Eragon, The Neverending Story or Alice in Wonderland. The Bard especially made it trashy, which the show in general could not afford even more. The CGI was OK but very bad and obvious in the cave where the black guy lives. Without knowing anything about The Witcher I was kind of lost in the beginning. There should have been some kind of scrolling text like in the Star Wars movies that explains the situation or a narrator like Galadriel in the beginning of LOTR Fellowship
One of the most boring shows of the last years. It's so dry and uninspired. Bad bad bad.
Didn't read, didn't play and my thoughts are exactly the same as in this @lainfan's comment - https://trakt.tv/comments/268354
I wroto on dec 22th that couldn't reach ep.2, because ep.01 was too boring. Thank God I changed my mind. It's getting much better. Ep01 sucks, but I liked the others very much.
Pros: catched books and games atmospheres.
Cons: no Gwent ;/
It was good. I liked it.
The timeline was convoluted & the geography, kingdoms and story was confusing for someone who isn't familiar with the source materials.
But I enjoyed it enough, so I'm looking forward to a season 2.
Toss a coin to your Witcher O'Valley of Plenty O'Valley of Plenty ho ho ho :heart_eyes:
I'd watch it over and over avain just for Jaskier !
I loved this first Season! Great start. Makes me want to see more and I can't wait for season 2!!
I enjoyed this one a lot, though some things could have been done better. The different timelines can be pretty confusing, though if you pay attention to the dialogue its not that hard to figure out what is going on. Still, it could have been handled better and the worldbuilding needed a little more explaining too. However the story is interesting, the acting is good and the effects are well done. Overall an enjoyable show.
Fantastic
If someone asked me to write what can we call this serie?
I think i could say a mix of Lord of the Rings World with Game of Thrones violence
We might be in presence of one of the best stories to watch in next decade!
I thought it was pretty good, Cavill is great as Geralt.
The time jumps were a bit confusing at first, but once you pick up on it, it's pretty clear what order everything is happening in.
I'm confused why Jaskier is not aging, I thought he's supposed to be human with no magical enhancements. Also, slightly upset Triss is not a redhead. Fight scene at Blaviken was art, can't tell me otherwise.
Yennefer for me is the least liked character on the show, I can't stand her whining, "oh boo hoo, poor me, had a tough life" ffs just get over yourself already, ugh.
Overall, good season, I'm excited for next one, I just hope Yennefer is less annoying then.
Didnt read the book or play the game. But the language used is really modern English. Maybe they should make it sound difficult and old fashioned to understand to fit into this genre.
Beheadings? Mmhm...like that...sweet creature effects??..check...titties...mmhm like those too... shhhhh don't tell mom
I just want to say that I love it.
I thought this would be one of those shows that got better if I had patience, but it really didn't by the end of season 1. Maybe I'll have to watch season 2, but I get the feeling this show just isn't for me. Maybe I would've enjoyed it more if I read the books or played the games, but I'm way less interested in that now considering how the show went.
The timelines weren't too confusing once I realized what was happening, but it seemed unnecessary as there didn't seem to be any payoff or reason to tell the story that way. Other shows doing the same thing were much more satisfying when things fell into place, and it usually delivered plot points in a meaningful way. I understand certain characters not aging, but the bard, queen, etc. must all have some kind of secret magical background yet to be revealed since they didn't age either. It's hardly the biggest flaw of the show, though.
I laughed at some scenes that were supposed to be serious, like Borch falling to his "death" and his voice as a dragon, some fights, etc. I don't understand the romance between Geralt and Yennefer. I thought maybe their relationship would develop in the earlier timeline and I'd find out why he thought she's amazing, but nothing like that happened.
There is pretty much no character development for anyone other than Yennefer, but even in her case some of it didn't seem believable or I must have missed something. Geralt was fine, especially with the "Hmm" and "Fuck" memes. The bard's relationship to Geralt was fun. The action sequences were alright. None of that is really enough to praise the show for though.
People comparing The Witcher to Game of Thrones must be comparing it to season 7. It's not bad enough to deserve comparisons with season 8, but it's certainly not as good as the first half of the show when it had an actual writer's content to work from.
I started The Witcher right after binge watching The Dragon Prince, an animated series with an age rating of 7+. You'd think it wouldn't make sense to compare them, but The Dragon Prince is better in pretty much every aspect except the number of tits. It has many similar elements like animosity between humans and elves, fantasy creatures like dragons, in-fighting among humans, "good" and "bad" magic, etc. The plot is interesting and has a direction with good use of foreshadowing, characters progress and develop through their experiences, have reasonable motives, and even the romance was more believable and powerful. The comedy was also much better, even though that's more subjective. I'm looking forward to season 4 of The Dragon Prince way more than season 2 of The Witcher.
I can’t seem to figure out if I love this or hate this. That being said, it made me laugh, the sword fighting isn’t only very well choreographed but also brilliantly shot, and it’s not as confusing as some people claim it is. To be completely honest I think I was just distracted by Henry Cavill most of the time.
At first I got confused by the timeline, but didn't let it to bother and kept watching. Eventually I loved the way how the timeline got put together, and I'm really waiting for the second season now.
Full disclosure, I have not read the books or played the video games, so, my review is entirely about this first season of the series. I also should say that I have no problem suspending belief and thoroughly love worlds built on folklore archetypes and magic. I really enjoyed this series. With all the award garnering series coming out lately, built around reality based stories about corruption, sexual predatation and the abuse of power, I really needed to escape into fantasy, where even the anti-heros have codes they live by. I enjoy that the series draws from a canon of books where the plot and premises have already been well conceived. I thought the casting was excellent. Henry Cavill is such a beautiful man, and he broods with the best of them. Freya Allan adeptly portrayed both innocence and the cunning of survival as she inhabited Ciri. And, Anya Chalotra is stunning in her reveal. The chronology of this season is easy to untangle if you take the clue from the first episodes title (THE END'S BEGINNING). Quite simply, Ciri's timeline is the present and all the other, ageless characters' stories are excerpted from the hundred years before Ciri's present. Great Action. Great adventure. There is A LOT of nudity and gratuitous sexual content (I wish productions would trust the content of a series for their audience rather than having to fed them the crack of sex to keep their attention). I give this series an 8 (great entertainment) out of 10. [Fantasy Action Adventure]
my old mom wanted to watch this i told her don't bother if i can barely understand whats going on with the time jumps you wont have a clue whats happening so there we go. If you like putting the pieces together and jigsaws you'll love this.
Shout by ZillahVIP 2BlockedParent2020-01-01T00:32:28Z
Best video game adaptation yet.