It's an OK action flick that has a character named John McClane in it. But it's not "Die Hard" in my book.
Too much CGI stunts, which were a thing back then. But they don't age well and were already over the top in 2007. Don't like the plot much. hacking just isn't exciting. Writing was more intelligent in the first three. Farrell is a very unlikeable character and more then once I wished he would be shot. Gabriel is a weak villain - all bark but no bite. Can't do anything by himself. But that's your modern day action movie villain right there.
Like I said before, part three was the last real "Die Hard" movie. The rest were just milking the cow.
Shout by FinFanBlockedParent2023-10-03T18:03:07Z
It's an OK action flick that has a character named John McClane in it. But it's not "Die Hard" in my book.
Too much CGI stunts, which were a thing back then. But they don't age well and were already over the top in 2007. Don't like the plot much. hacking just isn't exciting. Writing was more intelligent in the first three. Farrell is a very unlikeable character and more then once I wished he would be shot. Gabriel is a weak villain - all bark but no bite. Can't do anything by himself. But that's your modern day action movie villain right there.
Like I said before, part three was the last real "Die Hard" movie. The rest were just milking the cow.