@r96sk You may not have liked the film, taste cannot be discussed. But you can never say that the film is bad or say that it is boring. The plot of this film is simply one of the best stories of humanity. Who doesn't want to be a child forever and be able to play without worrying? Neverland is the best place to live. The film has no flaws, it is built with the best in the film industry.
Shout by r96skBlockedParent2020-05-13T00:27:39Z
I'm not a massive fan of this, I found it a little dull to watch to be honest; admittedly, I'm not a big lover of the 1953 production either - but that is better than this.
2003's 'Peter Pan' is underwhelming. I would've liked to see them take a bigger spin on the original story, like seeing Hook's background in detail or taking a deeper dive into Neverland itself. The casting could've been greater, just like the camera work and colour palette. The special effects are solid, even if they haven't aged incredibly.
Jason Isaacs is OK as the antagonist, managing to look as devilish as you'd expect. Jeremy Sumpter (Pan) and Rachel Hurd-Wood (Wendy) are fine, too. No amazing performances here though, in my opinion at least.