Peter Pan 2003

Emotional porn for adults.... If you believe....

(If you cry four bars into, "The Wizard of Oz," then you could enjoy this.)

I love this recreation of the Peter Pan story. The characters are all perfect in their roles, and the story is really sweet. Effects are great too

This dude who plays Peter Pan made me want to jump off a bridge... In fact all child actors have this effect on me.

I'm not a massive fan of this, I found it a little dull to watch to be honest; admittedly, I'm not a big lover of the 1953 production either - but that is better than this.

2003's 'Peter Pan' is underwhelming. I would've liked to see them take a bigger spin on the original story, like seeing Hook's background in detail or taking a deeper dive into Neverland itself. The casting could've been greater, just like the camera work and colour palette. The special effects are solid, even if they haven't aged incredibly.

Jason Isaacs is OK as the antagonist, managing to look as devilish as you'd expect. Jeremy Sumpter (Pan) and Rachel Hurd-Wood (Wendy) are fine, too. No amazing performances here though, in my opinion at least.

This movie is amazing. While Spielberg's Hook to my surprise was a straight Drama with no magic, no imagination and no fantasy, this movie is full of magic and imagination.

I was obsessed with this film as a kid, watched it constantly. I was also in love w Jeremy Sumpter lol. It will always hold a special place in my heart.

It's a shame the cgi aged so badly. But the Peter Pan story never gets old.

I watched this a thousand times, no need to say Stumpter became my first crush ,when I even didn't know what that meant yet

Image 4.25 / 4.25 5 Sound / 5. Paco was right that's fine