In it's first year this felt like a "Star Trek" series with no ambition and little progress but with a cool premise. Then suddenly it started to become bolder and more interesting. It dared to go deeper into religion, politics and character studies than any of the other Trek series did on the air. Today I would say that this series began a kind of production that we would later see on cable with long-running story arcs, a huge cast list and pushing the envelope on what was allowed on TV. The last 10 episodes of this show (and beginning of the 6th) was like seeing a long-running 10 episode HBO series on syndicated TV to be blunt. I also liked that this was "Star Trek" where the leads were flawed and not perfect so they actually had to have internal fights with themselves and their own demons at times. They even managed to make their villains three-dimensional and sympathetic and I liked them all. What would have helped the show would have been an even healthier budget would have given some scenes better effects, more action and detailed battle sequences as this show had bigger ambition and tried to be more epic than what they really could manage to get through on screen. Some lousy embarrassing comedy and weak B-plots ruined some episodes too but this show produced some magic moments and is the show that has more hits than any of the other newer Trek shows that I have seen so far. This is the one show that deserve a revisit if one only skip over most of the filler episodes in season 1, 2 and major part of the third one.
Not as good as The Original Series and The Next Generation, but it is not bad.
I have been re-watching the every season of Deep Space Nine in these binge batches, and my brother Jomo (RIP) was right: It is Star Trek’s darkest turn, and it’s most heart breaking.
Well, it's the best Star Trek Show that was produced in that era (and it's definitely way better than Discovery). And I'm saying that although I grew up with TNG and still think that Voyager's Seven of Nine is the best character in all of those shows of that era. TNG was still too much like the original series. Voyager felt too isolated from the Federation (well that's the point of that show I guess). DS9 was bolder. It experimented more. It explored more races, more worlds, was able to create realistic, credible and intriguing characters (especially the female characters are strong) and their relations among each other in that interstellar melting pot. The show touched religion, politics, racism and the universal concepts of love and friendship. All neatly bound together by the most dramatic and most ambitious overarching storyline of any Star Trek show. In the streaming era, DS9's non-episodic story telling is perfect (while it may have contributed to show's low rating back in the TV era). Seasons 1 and 2 are weaker - just like TNG they needed time to explore what to do with the show (and how to overcome the disadvantage that a space station can't fly to other worlds and explore space). Not everything was great though. Some lighthearted episodes are mere fillers (they probably produced too many episodes per year!), some races are big stereotypes (but often great fun for the same reason), sometimes the mystic elements (that were admittedly always part of Star Trek) are a bit too dominant and too silly, and the whole stage design isn't very flashy (but memorable and unique thanks to Cardassian architecture but I never got my head around how small the promenade looked like and how few people actually filled the station although the station was clearly a behemoth), sometimes it has too much of a shallow soap opera appeal to it and the last season - however great the overarching story line comes to a conclusion - feels somehow out of place (which is the fault of the guy who denied Farrell a new contract so that Jadzia had to die this pointless and not very well-written death. I mean, Ezri was also a strong character but it took too much time to really get to know her and to care for her).
PS: Original quality looks horrible. Yes kids, that's how TV looked back then. Sadly, DS9 - for various reasons and unlike TNG- can't be remastered in HD in the traditional way. But recently I happened to notice that upscaled version popped up all over the Internet. Naturally, I can't provide the sources. They are probably fan-made works w/o proper permission. AI upscaling looks astonishingly impressive though.
Since the wonder of DVD's I have re-watch this series again. Personally this is my favorite Star Trek series. I am a Star Trek nerd and will randomly watch different parts of Star Trek for background when I am working on other projects.
Deep Space Nine is the one series that I normally re-watch from beginning to end once ever year. It is easy to just power through them, which is pretty easy to do. One of the strengths of this series is that it has a series long story to tell while most of the episodes stand alone. The full story of Sisko starts in the very first episode and continues along in every season to develop the story and come to a sad, but fulfilling ending.
If you are on the edge of Star Trek, this is a great series to watch. I would not use this series to introduce a new user to Star Trek. It does avoid and make some assumptions about the viewers understanding of Star Trek lore.
I´m at the point in my personal Star Trek re-run where I reached the beginning of DS9. And althought I´ve seen the show twice already I´m tickling with anticipation of what awaits me. There aren´t many shows that have that effect on me.
This is the best Star Trek Series!
I’ve rewatched this show probably more than any other Star Trek show. Set on a space station instead of a starship gives it a whole new feeling. Lots of great performances and great characters.
It's a pity that the quality of this series is degraded by the poor transfer to DVD. Looks more like the VHS tapes on which I originally watched most of it in the 1990s. It's unlikely, I gather, that any commercial effort will be made to upscale it to 1080p. Because it is excellent, although I agree with those who opine that much of the first 2 seasons can be watched just once and become somewhat cringeworthy on subsequent viewings.
The setting of a space station permits far more development of all the main characters. DS9 doesn't fall into the trope of other Star Trek offerings; another week, another alien race, another planet. Well, not often, anyway.
Long, well-thought through story arcs are also a consequence.
Recommended.
As a departure from the optimistic and idealized future of TNG, DS9 tells one of the most engaging and thought-provoking military dramas of all time. Themes of conflict, religion, and morality are pervasive and executed well by a surprisingly talented cast; although, in regular Star Trek fashion, the show takes a season to really find its legs.
Is it a crime to slightly prefer this to TNG? I prefer a lot of the specific episodes, set pieces, overarching storylines, and characters, but maybe I’m just saying that because I saw this show more recently. Either way, I love both.
I am, and will always be, a DS9 snob. Taken as a whole, it's the very best of Trek TV so far.
This is definitely not my favourite Star Trek, however, the lasts seasons are great. You just need to get through the first ones.
IMHO the best Star Trek show up to date.
We get to see more of "everyday" life in the future and not just the life on-board a star ship.
Shout by DeletedBlockedParent2013-12-06T02:52:51Z
Great show even better premise. We need more like it...