Bit weird that this episode and the previous one are labeled as a two-parter. The plots actually aren't directly related - the drug thing was completely wrapped up last episode, and this one dealt with the booby-trapped house. On top of that, they also aired a month apart (because of the holiday break), rather than back-to-back like a lot of two-parters do. Other episodes that aren't labeled as two-parters have picked up where the previous left off, so why does this get the two-parter treatment? For example, 3x10 and 3x11 of Chicago Fire have almost the exact same type of thing going on, with the ending of ep10 continuing on into ep11 and becoming the focus. Ep11 picks up directly where ep10 leaves off. But it's not labeled a two-parter.
It's kind of strange, but I've always been a fan of the trope where unfitting music plays loudly in the building because the villain set it up. I don't know why. I just like it.
Shout by JasperKazaiVIP 2BlockedParentSpoilers2023-08-14T06:10:19Z
Bit weird that this episode and the previous one are labeled as a two-parter. The plots actually aren't directly related - the drug thing was completely wrapped up last episode, and this one dealt with the booby-trapped house. On top of that, they also aired a month apart (because of the holiday break), rather than back-to-back like a lot of two-parters do. Other episodes that aren't labeled as two-parters have picked up where the previous left off, so why does this get the two-parter treatment?
For example, 3x10 and 3x11 of Chicago Fire have almost the exact same type of thing going on, with the ending of ep10 continuing on into ep11 and becoming the focus. Ep11 picks up directly where ep10 leaves off. But it's not labeled a two-parter.
It's kind of strange, but I've always been a fan of the trope where unfitting music plays loudly in the building because the villain set it up. I don't know why. I just like it.