This is a good movie. It is important to throw a spotlight on our cultural flaws and ingrained pre-judgements of each other. Otherwise. how will we overcome them? It is a good story, incredible in its root in reality. The cast and their performances were good (with the exception of Topher Grace who was horribly miscast). It had some unexpected treasures, like Harry Belafonte as Jerome Turner who mesmerized us with his testimony of brutality. I give this film a 7 (good) out of 10. Does its subject matter alone elevate it to Best Picture (it is nominated in 5 other categories for Oscars, as well)? I'm not sure. MINI RANT - In an age when popular understanding of history is based on the movies people see, I think it is important to point out that if a movie says it is based on actual events, as when a movie says it is based on a book, there is a lot of artistic license taken to shift details around and changes made to make it a good movie, even to the extent that the film is more fiction than fact. I'll give you just three examples from this film, it is based on the 2014 memoir BLACK KLANSMAN by Ron Stallman. The writers moved the story back seven years (1979 to 1972) to facilitate a reference to a number of blaxploitation films. David Duke didn't find out that Stallworth was black until 2006 (27 years later) when called upon by a reporter to comment on these events. The detective who is characterized as Flip Zimmerman was not Jewish, that is a total contrivance of the film. Two other Oscar nominated films, also saying they were based on actual events, THE FAVORITE and MARY QUEEN OF SCOTS, are really fiction far from fact. Beware fiction masquerading as fact! END MINI RANT. Fun Fact: Stallman still carries his KKK membership in his wallet. [Crime Drama]
The conversation around this film inevitably ends up at the closing few minuets. to get it out of the way I think the way this film wraps up was certainly a bold choice on Lee’s part that helps ground he movie in today’s political climate and draws parallels between the struggles of the of the 70′s and the struggles of today. This will alienate a lot of potential audience members but it is a Spike Lee film so you should know what you are in for.
The film proceeding the controversial short documentary is actually one of the most entertaining films I have seen all year and certainly isn’t shy about tackling political and social issues head on. At times it can be tough to believe that this is a completely true story as the screenplay elegantly glides from one insane encounter to the next without ever flinching. As far as I can tell with my limited research this is a largely accurate retelling of the story and if that is the case then screenwriters Charlie Wachtel, David Rabinowitz, Kevin Willmott and director Spike Lee landed on a perfect story for Lee’s unique style. The influence of black cinema from the 70′s is felt everywhere from the cinematography to the music gives the film a feeling of cool that not many modern films pull of.
If BlacKkKlansman is not up for at least one acting Oscar then I might just have to give up on trying to predict Oscar nominees. Adam Driver is the best he has ever been in a non Star Wars project, Topher Grace delivers an unsettlingly charming and perfectly threatening performance as Grand Wizard David Duke and John David Washington breaks out of his father’s shadow within seconds of screen time.
BlacKkKlansman is absolutely going to rank high on my best of the year list this year! this is a film that has to be seen.
I expected much more. How could I say it ... Cinema is the seventh art, and the art said in a simple way is to express feelings. However, the message of this film seems more like a slogan than an artistic expression.
On the other hand, the script is bad: it contains hints of humor without grace, and the formula it has to make the plot is predictable and incorrect. For example, at the beginning of the investigation, an atmosphere of tension is created when Felix subjects Flip to the lie detector. It is obvious that he will be saved… I mean, if he's been saved from this, also when he's questioned at the bar, he's always going to be saved. It is also true that the racism shown in the film is forced. For example, in 'Serpico', discrimination between police - although it is of another type - it looks very well reflected.
To finish, as I said at the beginning, the message is very weak and this is reflected both at the beginning and at the end. If the movie weren't drunk on a commercial script, it wouldn't take an extraction of what happened in 2017. In my opinion this final scene is superfluous, there is no way to unite it with a film set in the 70s.
Polemical, didactic, confrontational, angry, trenchant - a state-of-the-nation address
BlacKkKlansman is a film with a whole hell of a lot on its mind. It opens with one of the most (in)famous scenes from Victor Fleming's Gone with the Wind (1939), before pivoting to a fictional precursor of Alex Jones lecturing the audience on the dangers of the "negroid", and later takes in everything from Kwame Ture and the All-African People's Revolutionary Party to David Duke and his political aspirations, before lambasting D.W. Griffith's The Birth of a Nation (1915), criticising the tropes of classic Blaxploitation films such as Gordon Parks's Shaft (1971), Gordon Parks Jr.'s Super Fly (1972), and Jack Hill's Coffy (1973), going into agonising detail regarding the 1916 lynching of Jesse Washington, sardonically criticising police bureaucracy, and concluding with a montage of the 2017 Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, including raw footage of James Alex Fields, Jr. ploughing a car into a crowd of counter-protestors, resulting in the death of Heather Heyer, intercut with Duke championing Donald Trump's presidency, and Trump's own reluctance to condemn the Neo Nazi/white supremacist component of the rally. The film then ends with an evocatively worded tribute to Heyer, before fading to an upside-down black and white American flag (which is not, as is often stated, a political protest, but is actually a governmentally approved signal for "dire distress"). Yep; this is a film with a lot to say.
For my complete review, please visit: https://boxd.it/w7oJr
What Get Out should have been.
This movie is a funny, heartbreaking, and genuinely chilling experience through and through. I really don't wanna spoil anything here so I won't mention specific plot points or details, but by God, this film was excellent. The brutal and realistic way they portray racism in the 70s is almost staggering to watch, and they somehow found a way for us to laugh at it all the while. Now, I admit, my previous comment about Get Out is probably soured over the ah, "hype" it got upon release and the subsequent constant praise I had to deal with from some not so friendly people, so I am of course, biased. But I can confidently say that, while Get Out is a great and enjoyable film in its own right, it did not make me feel the same emotions that this movie did. The last five minutes when they showed the footage of recent events was a moment that only movies like Infinity War and Shawshank Redemption have made me experience in my lifetime.
But, enough comparing it to another film. What does BlackkKlansman have that holds it up on its own? Well, aside from great acting, score, comedic timing, dramatic moments, tense moments, thrilling action scenes, and heartbreaking parts? It has genuinely good commentary. Someone else mentioned this in another comment, but the way this movie presents racism from the 70s and uses it as a means to show that this is still a problem today is something else. It does so without coming off as preachy, and as such it's extremely effective in its own right.
10/10. Loved it.
One of the most easily enjoyable Spike Lee movies. This isn't as gritty and dark as Bamboozled though it does borrow a lot from it. There are a multitude of reasons why I've had this waiting to be watched mostly because I'm never sure if I wanted to have to watch yet another movie with so much racism but this was much more palatable than a typical period piece. The comedy isn't over the top as it shouldn't be. The racist characters did their job without chewing up the scene the way I expected with all the talk about Toby McGuire's David Duke (and seeing Duke at the end of the movie. I can see now that Toby does make a decent fit).
From a narrative perspective, this is everything the trailer promised it would be. A black cop signs up for the Klan and when he needs to meet in person a white Jewish cop pretends to be him. One of the big things that arise in that situation is that they don't sound the same. But even though phones were much more clear in the 70s it's both understandable and laughable that this doesn't really come up. They infiltrate and try to stall out Klan activities and keep getting accepted deeper and deeper into the hierarchy.
What little I've heard in terms of reviews have focused on the ending which if you've seen Bamboozled you can prepare yourself for. A lot of people call it ham-fisted. I'll agree it's not subtle. Some will say it was unnecessary and I'll disagree. I think that ending footage is what will elevate the movie out of it's time. It seems cheesy and overdone now but in 10 or even 5 years from now that's the sort of thing that will have more punch. I grew up watching Merry Melodies and all those classic cartoons and seeing them at the end of Bamboozled was the talk of the movie for me and my friends when we walked out of the theatre. America is a country under white power and white power is something that always finds a way to suggest racism presented as bad as it was is disingenuous. "It was bad but not as bad as all that" and while it's not a perfectly encapsulated here as it was in Bamboozled the end scene does serve the purpose of showing viewers later on that yes, it was as bad as we said it was.
https://www.vox.com/culture/2018/5/15/17355432/blackkklansman-review-spike-lee-david-duke-charlottesville
Alissa Wilkinson is the name of the author who writted this critic in the Vox’s plataform. To beggin with it , I should say that I do agree with her in some points and that I hold a whole bunch of different point of views on the other side.
Well, we, the brazillians share among ourselfs a very solid ideia that there is a certain white supremacist group in America like the KKK and the neo-Nazis, and of curse there is, but sometimes, from what it is passed from the Hollywood’s movies which are very present in our “brazillian way of life”, it seems that this disgusting group occupies about 10 to 30 % of the north –american population, and we know that it’s very above it.
This movie criticizes the Trump’s polices to the US government as everyone who hold his opinion was a self-underscovered member of the Ku Klux Klan, and that’s absolutely wrong, we in Brazil suffer the same ideological fallacy, “if you’re not with us you’re supposed to be an ugly and terrifieng nazi who should be removed from society” they say. Of curse I agree with them that mostly of the racist America loves Trump for its “simple and careless purposes to his country”, I am trying to express liberalism with a leftiest mentality, but I do think that it’s a historical mark from the pass in which the mostly of the southern states were all stateless policies friendly .
Moreover, I agree with her that , unfortunately, there is still racism and prejudice marks in US and brazillian “democratic institutions”, and, to my simple way of viewing the world, it’s proportionated by the defaults of the general reforms in Brazil and United States politics which were uncapable of dismantling past hatred-baseated policies.
At last, I really enjoyed the movie, the best that I have seen in this recent time for sure. I will try to bring more commentaries in the next time, but from now it’s all.
This is a great and interesting story, I mean it's like that Chappelle Show sketch! A black Klansman! Well I'll be! And it's a true story of how Detective Ron Stallworth infiltrated the KKK over the phone and even had long discussions with infamous Grand Wizard David Duke. Unfortunately it isn't a great movie, but it does have it's moments. I haven't done the full dive to compare the actual real life events and the stuff made up by Hollywood to make it into a movie but right off the bat it is apparent that the romantic subplot between Ron and student activist Patrice is completely fabricated. It never feels real and even starts but him just walking up to her with no game and just being instantly liked. I understand that this character is here to represent Ron's inner struggle as a black man trying to solve problems from the inside. Being the first black police man on the Colorado Springs force and seeing how the system is designed to keep people like him down but still having a belief that it can work, there is a lot to mine there. In my opinion it isn't handled that well and neither is this bomb subplot that is also completely fabricated. I suppose it works for a movie or what you think a movie should have in it to go through the motions. I also understand that the movie wants to make the Klansman look like fools, and it should, but the movie goes so far into making them toothless fools that you start to wonder if the Klan is really a threat at all. Besides these structural issues there really are some great moments and sequences, especially when they intercut Harry Belafonte telling the story of Jesse Washington being publicly lynched in 1916 with Klansman hooting and hollering while watching "The Birth Of A Nation". I'm not completely sure that the montage at the end of Charlottesville works for the movie but it is powerful stuff. It seems to be there as the movie kind of ends with Ron and the gang in a happy place and hopeful that things can be changed, but a stark reminder that there is still a ways to go.
It's a shame that a movie has to be brought down by the shameless (?) use of footage before the credits to make a political point that has been all to clear from the start of the film. I didn't check to see Spike Lee made this movie but in retrospect I should have guessed and seen his style (the rally at the start being the first indication).
I enjoyed the humour in it -even though there was not much of it- I enjoyed the actors (except that guy from Blacklist - RIP Tom Keane!) but I wouldn't call this the best movie of the year. I cheered at the end when they "pranked" David Duke but then all of a sudden I get Charlottesville shoved down my throat and the car that ran over people there (people on our continent got run over too by cars and trucks... That's hate too) making the whole thing a bit sour mainly, and purely cause of the political agenda they're pulling.
There are plenty of better movies out there that tackle the problems with racism... (Mississipi Burning, Amistad, Roots, Gran Torino, Glory, Get Out,... to name a few) and they do so without being too on the nose.
In the infamous words of senator Clay Davis (who seems to cameo in this movie): "Shiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiit."
Review by Andrew BloomVIP 9BlockedParent2019-02-07T00:28:13Z
[9.0/10] It was hard for me not to think of The Departed while watching BlacKkKlansman. While Spike Lee takes a much different tack with his “man undercover” movie than Martin Scorsese did with his, both films plop their protagonists in a double life, one where they have to feign loyalty to one group and preserve it for another, and plays in the tension and cognitive dissonance that this sort of forced split personality creates.
But BlacKkKlansman goes further on that front than The Departed did. It tells the story of Ron Stallworth, a black police officer in Colorado Springs in the 1970s who, with the help of a fellow agent to do the body work and some phone line trickery, manages to infiltrate the Klu Klux Klan. Lee uses that premise to magnify the duality of his protagonist exponentially.
In Lee’s telling, Stallworth isn’t just a cop on the one hand, and a faux-member of a hate group at odds with them on the other. He creates a fictionalized persona for himself that he shares with another person, to where “Ron Stallworth” is, at once, a virulent but fictional white supremacist, a Jewish man who provide a physical presence, and a Black man who gives “Ron” his voice. And at the same time, the film establishes the real Ron as an outsider at the police station given the color of his skin, and an outsider in the black community given his affiliation with the cops.
As much as BlacKkKlansman is a film about the pathetic but persistent and pernicious nature of hate groups, as much as it succeeds in following the tension and catharsis of a police investigation that is fraught on multiple levels, it is first and foremost about identity: how it’s forged, how it can be forced upon you, and how much it is both informed by but also immutable within different contexts. Ron Stallworth is a black man, a cop, a colleague, a lover, an informant, an ally, and a card-carrying member of the KKK. This film is devoted to teasing out the threads of those different facets of his identity, and then tying them in knots.
And yet it works on each of these levels. It’s hard to miss when Lee intends the film as an object lesson on the cockroach-like qualities of the Klan and its brand of hate. He makes the movie’s resonance to current events all but explicit, and tempers his moments of victory over them with examples of how deep their hatred runs, how hard-if-not-impossible to stamp out that hatred is, and how little will there is at the top to do what it would take to accomplish that. Throughout the runtime, Lee peppers the audience with details about the KKK’s ideology fermenting in dark bars and family basements, the tendrils the group has wrapped around the hearts and minds of its members who hide in plain sight, and the efforts by those in charge to make their message palatable and dress it up as something more respectable to larger swaths of the public.
But at the same time, if you somehow missed all those ideas which barely qualify as subtext, BlacKkKlansman works just as well as a nuts and bolts undercover cop story. The pacing of the film is nigh-perfect, as Lee and company spoon out close calls and tense moments of increasing intensity with just the right rhythm. Stallworth and his partner come closer and closer to exposing the threat posed by the local Klan chapter, at the same time worst of the KKK’s hardliners come closer and closer to making that threat into a real life tragedy. The way Lee, as both writer and director, puts “Ron Stallworth” deeper into the machinations of the Klan at the same time the risks of exposure and harm are ratcheted up is near-perfect.
Still, apart from its social commentary, and its undercover cop flick bona fides, BlacKkKlansman serves as a meditation on what it means to carry a variety of different labels in modern American life, and how much our recognition of and willingness to own those labels comes when we’re confronted with them. No scene makes that point better than when Stallworth’s partner, Flip Zimmerman, reflects on the threats, implicit and explicit, he faced when going undercover as “Ron” given his semitic visage. He recognizes his privilege, how he could choose not to engage with his Jewish heritage because he didn’t want to and, more importantly, didn’t have to, until suddenly it created a mortal threat for him. Suddenly that slice of his identity takes up more room in his brain, becomes unavoidable, when it marks him not only as “the other” but puts him in the sort of danger the real Stallworth has to face everyday and can’t eschew so easily.
Still, as much as Lee wants to interrogate how much risk and differences expose those parts of our identities, he’s also very sly about drawing out the similarities between unlikely groups. He juxtaposes the rapt attention and cries of a group of black activists hearing a tale of horror recounted by their elder with the same stilled admiration and virulent chat of the local Klan listening to their leader. He mirrors the disdain and suspicion, in a way that neither humanizes the Klan or demonizes the activists, but rather spotlights the irony of these moments, and makes both known and recognizable rather than distant and abstract.
The cuts between the two groups are part and parcel with Lee’s mastery of the cinematic form in BlacKkKlansman. With a speech from a visiting luminary to the local young activists, Lee manages to capture the stirring power of the speaker’s call to action, the impressionistic signs of admiration by an audience inspired by the words, and the pull and resistance within an undercover Ron Stallworth, trying both to do his job and honor his community in a position that makes it hard to do either.
That’s what pushes this film ahead of The Departed in my book. Lee uses all his abilities to put Stallworth in a hall of mirrors, where he’s forced to face a myriad of different reflections of himself. Some are familiar, hopeful even. Some are haunting and inescapable. And others are barely recognizable, twisted and bent out of shape, But all of them are him in some way, and Lee never flinches from the internal conflict those different identities -- some chosen, some forced, some invented -- create for his star. Beyond cop or outlaw, beyond rich or poor, BlacKkKlansman dives into the different dimensions that brand us, buoy us, and define us in modern America, and ties and tears at them until it’s clear which can be changed and modulated and which are unalterable and inviolable, and for whom.