To be honest, this statement is naive. Whether it's CGI or AI, both have been manipulated by algorithms on the PC and approved and adapted by humans. You can say that the effects are still a bit strange, but only the tools have changed, not the way films are made or released.
@zxki I disagree. There hasn't been an original movie since what... "The Sixth Sense" 20 years ago? Everything is a new attempt at improving on established concepts, and the handful of movies that have done well are CGI super-heavy to the point the audience has no problem "willingly-suspending disbelief". AI is probably our ownly hope for original scripts at this point.
Shout by zxkiBlockedParent2024-04-20T11:32:51Z
As great as the acting, dialogue, and storytelling was, a part of me can't give this a good rating for the use of AI. Any movie that uses AI automatically gets a stiff finger from me. Why? Because movies are made by and watched by humans all over the world. As well as music, which this movie incorporated really well, movies are one of the only forms of media that can reach anyone. We need movies, with the help of technology or not, to be human generated. What we don't need is computer generated movies, with human inputs. Even if it's just an image, why does it need to be AI generated?