Good episode, but here I am saying it, I don't like Michael so much :(
and in addition, why the fuck did they change Spock??? He is not the same actor who is doing Spock in the rest of the movies, this should be a timeline stream. Now we have two actors for the same Spock in the same time area.

Discovery is featured 2256–2257
Star trek (2009 movie) is featured 2258–2259
Edit: they are not in the same time-line but still Spock should be played the same actor

I really don't know how they are going to fix that!

loading replies

5 replies

@ahmedhamdy90
The actor playing Spock in the movies is in the Kelvin timeline. This is not the Kelvin timeline.

@anthoney65 Mmm so there are 2 time-lines, one is the original and the other created by Nero's arrival?

@ahmedhamdy90 You are correct. Actually it's the Kelvin universe, not "just" a timeline.

@ahmedhamdy90 I doubt they even made an effort to get Zach Quinto. At the same time I doubt he would have been interested. Anyway, having another actor playing Spock is the least of problems and so far I can't even say how he`s doing, really. All we have seen him doing is mumbling around. I'll reserve judgement until later.
But I agree 100% with you on Burnham.

@phil_s No I don't get it, what do you mean by another universe? We have 2 theories in physics, parallel universe or an alternative time-line, and yeah, another time-line will create a parallel universe "I suppose".

Loading...