All Comments about...

Devs 2020

it's a very boring show. I couldn't get past episode 3.

loading replies

Alex Garland, the man behind Ex Machina and Annihilation has done it again. Floored by the first two episodes. The man creates art.

loading replies

What I hoped for: descent cyberpunk tech noir detective with megacorporation and government conspiracy
What I got instead: another religious centered bullshit trivia

loading replies

I take back my review. This was a waste of 8 hours of my life. Beyond being super duper slow. The whole concept was dumb. This was basically someone’s art project. Def not for the masses.

loading replies
3

Shout by whos_ur_buddha
BlockedParent2020-03-17T03:12:13Z— updated 2020-04-03T17:34:39Z

This show is not for everyone. Great cinematography, audio/visuals, tone, etc. but veeeeerrrrrrry sloooooooow. The acting is slow. People move slow. They talk slow & replies are even slower. Camera moves slow. It’s not normal or real.

If you don't like slow moving show, you'll hate this show.

If you want something artistic, watch this show.

However, majority of people will hate this show.

loading replies

In addition, it was a quite boring start.

loading replies

Liked a lot of it, but the lead actress is just awful. Maybe she was written this way, but I found it off putting. Still interesting, but maybe that's just my brain saying it had to be, since I loved Ex Machina.

loading replies

Love the art and atmosphere, but can somebody please wake me up when this gets interesting? The actors are putting me to sleep.

loading replies

absolutely plasticky the main “character”, the worst acting I ever seen

loading replies

It's good, but not easy to watch. The pace is very slow and many dialogs are boring. But just as you're falling asleep, they bring some interesting scientific or philosophic dialog, that makes you think. The show expects you to have some knowledge on science.

The show also has a very artistic approach, which I personally don't like to much. A lot of gold colours, antique looking tech and creepy faces. And then there is some terribly uncomfortable music. I guess it's supposed to serve the story by making you feel bad.

loading replies

Story 4/5
Characters 5/5
Depth 4/5
Cast 5/5
Artistry 4/5

loading replies

Finished. Enjoyed the unfolding of this story, and its twist and turns. The settings and scenery were superb, and the themes brooding and intense. One of those shows which makes you ponder reality, determinism and existence. In the end the Omega point was a constructed one but why the hell not, I say. This may be hard going for many, and some may turn to the wayside at the pacing. Deus ex machina. 9/10.

loading replies

This show has so many crazy moments, and it's actually a pretty interesting story about free will and life. While the acting wasn't out of this world, and I think the ending was a little lackluster, the characters were still interesting enough to keep the story going. I definitely recommend this to anyone who enjoys Garland's other works.

loading replies

The concept of the show is really neat, but does rely that you are interested in the quantum and many worlds interpretation and the consequences of that. If you are not, still will be a dull show.
That being said, the concept is nice and makes you think, but the story itself is too little and too slow. Should have been a mini serie at most.
The end was kind of bs though

loading replies

What is this self-indulgent remedial art school monstrosity I just watched?

loading replies

Shout by Joachim
BlockedParent2020-07-06T22:34:58Z— updated 2020-10-31T07:55:33Z

Had high hopes for this one. Great director and great cast. Started off strong with episode one but then proceeded to slowly decline. Episode 6 felt like 50 minutes of filler. Season finale felt a little flat. Wasn't a bad watch overall, but probably not among Garlands strongest work.

loading replies
9

Shout by Deleted
BlockedParent2020-04-20T20:10:24Z— updated 2020-05-31T18:25:04Z

The slow pace will put many people off but I was engaged throughout all of it. Nick Offerman shines as the tech messiah running Devs. Thought-provoking science fiction with great storytelling in each episode.

loading replies

Every time Forest appears, I think back to that character from The Hangover.

loading replies

It only took me 5 minutes to start cringing at this show. American gringo with fake Russian accent. Currently there doesn’t seem to go one American show/movie by without a dig at Russia. It's okay, but could they seriously not find a native Russian actor? Is this so hard for Hollywood?

loading replies
7

Shout by 0bfuscated
VIP
7
BlockedParentSpoilers2021-01-08T06:43:03Z

This was a pretty gripping show for me. They could have done more with the main devs predictive machine/program part, but the other parts of the story were interesting too.

Probably not worth re-watching ever.

loading replies

Ex Machina. Deus Ex Machina. Deus. Devs. Devils.
All the halos was some fallen angels type shit.

I fucking love Alex Garland. One of the only filmmakers I can think of that can truly make brilliant cerebral films, and in my view he is clearly the frontrunner of modern science fiction. Devs is no different, taking you to all sorts of places with ambition that could have only been made possible with the miniseries format. Honestly every auteur should get the chance to make at least one of these.

Forest's daughter - which plays central to the plot and there's a huge statue of her repeatedly shown throughout - is named Amaya (played by an actor named Amaya) which is what he names the company after. Put the company - Amaya - and the project - Devs which we all know is really Deus - together and you get something terribly close to 'amadeus' which means 'God's love'.
I wonder if this is is a cool way to say the daughter represents love that the company and therefore Forest is missing, and a literal fake statue of her portrays a fake kind of love being projected to the public/world.

loading replies

This is an odd one. I've never watched anything that dropped the ball this hard. It's a solid 8 all the way through up until the last episode and a half where it just becomes a bunch of montages and nonsense. Other than this weird flex about Christian mythology being historical, it's fantastic until it falls apart at the end. I gave it a 6 because I was loving it but then it disapoints as drastically as anything I've ever watched.

loading replies

I thought I was a really cool show. Alex Garland is definitely becoming one of my favorites.

loading replies

For some reason, I just kept watching until the end. The 8 episodes are paced very slow, which becomes annoying at times. This should have been made into a movie that's done in under 2 hours.

loading replies

I think this show either thought it was smarter than it was, or I'm clearly not clever enough to get it. I do suspect it's not the latter lol. The show isn't bad by any means but it's also not incredible/essential viewing, it's very slow and while I have no issues with slow builds you still need to pay it off with something which is one of the areas this show fails.

Maybe my thoughts would be more positive if I had watched this prior to watching Severance, but unfortunately, I was constantly comparing how it did similar vibes and themes in a better and more intriguing way in that show instead of this.

But it's only 8 episodes, and it tells a completely wrapped-up story so, if you have watched all of shows like Severance, Station Eleven, The Peripheral and need something else to toss on.

loading replies

Holy shit this show is an insufferable, boring, faux-intellectual, pretentious bullshit, featuring an unwatchably grating protagonist. The production and the score are great but it's incredible how this thing progressively gets worse with each episode. I made it about halfway before I gave up. I wish I had stopped after first episode.

loading replies

Shout by JJ
BlockedParentSpoilers2021-06-20T04:22:45Z

This show had glimpses of greatness but IMO they were fleeting. Convoluted, edgy technological concepts that tried too hard to cover up the otherwise confusing and uninteresting main plot. Some good, but mostly bad, acting. A good effort but poor follow through.

loading replies

Too bad, this could've been a good show...

loading replies

There were many things right with this miniseries, but also many things wrong

The ending is utterly disappointing

That they wanted to show Jesus as a "historical fact" is just plain stupid

The characters are supposed to be science people, so why should they use so much profanity? That takes away all credibility from them

In the end, it is not a waste of time, but it has potential to be so much better

loading replies

Shout by Deleted
BlockedParentSpoilers2020-04-18T02:11:40Z

A fine example of confuse a cat entertainment. Nick Offerman does his best Charlie Manson thousand yard stare while Alison Pill speaks volumes without saying a word. The other players all live through their spooky actions at a distance reality at their own peril. Meanwhile every shot of the big doll in the forest gives me the shivers. Enjoyable and obtuse in no specific order.

loading replies
7

Shout by Jomicorreia
BlockedParent2020-04-17T18:21:35Z— updated 2020-05-06T23:28:44Z

Half Good! Half eh.
Starts with USA vs Russia... same old. The side story is the gold of the serie, the rest... is blunt.


2.1 points -> Acting and Characters (0-3)
1.4 points -> Plot development (0-2)
1.6 points -> Cinematography (0-2)
0.8 points -> originality (0-1)
0.8 points -> Based on Genre / Theme (0-1)

0.7 -> Overall Quality (0-1)

Aka.7.4 points

loading replies

This is a very slow paced show. Great visuals and music but super slow.

If you aren't up for slow paced shows, watch it in the background while doing some other work. You don't have to pay much attention to the story.

loading replies

Moody, strange, and a bit ponderous. I am hoping though that in the end these Godless arrogant souls will be redeemed.

loading replies
Loading...