All Comments about...

Catherine the Great 2019

5

Shout by Nancy L Draper
VIP
8
BlockedParent2019-10-23T23:33:13Z— updated 2019-10-26T13:07:15Z

This was a great disappointment. I understand that to condense an expansive life into a 4 part TV series requires selective content and a seminole focus but to define Catherine the Great's life by a fabricated love story was just too hard for me to stomach. I'm a huge Helen Mirrren fan but there was just no motivation for her character nor chemistry with her co-star Jason Clarke. What a waste of talent. What a deconstruction of history. What a disappointment. I give the series a 5 (meh) out of 10. [Historical? Drama]

loading replies

Catherine had Paul when she was 24 (I think), which means, she would have been around 44 for his 20th birthday. As great as Helen Mirren is as an actress, why on Earth did they cast a 70 year-old lady to play a 40 year-old (and knowing Catherine died in her sixties)? I don't know if Paul had any living grandparents by the time he reached 20, but Helen would have been more believable and better casted as his grandmother than as Catherine. Also, Jason Clarke as a heartthrob? I'm sorry, but I don't see it. There are plenty of older, handsome british men. I just don't think he is one of them.

I feel like they messed up the whole thing by doing bad casting choices. A pity.

loading replies

Obviously Helen Mirren is great, she can do any role. The story is great and I saw all four episodes at once because you want to see more.
Very very nice

loading replies

[HBO] Hstory reduced to bedroom tales. Helen Mirren the Great.

loading replies

As entertaining as this was, I do feel like I want more. The story feels incredibly condensed, glossing over major areas of Catherine's reign. Personally, I would have liked to have the series span over multiple seasons, similar to how The Tudors ran, that way more time can be spent building and executing the story of Catherine (I also would've liked to have seen the coup d'état that put Catherine on the throne in the first place).

This is basically like if you've never read Harry Potter before and you decide to start from Goblet of Fire onwards, skimming through the chapters that you're reading.

The actors were fantastic though, especially Helen Mirren and Jason Clarke, which isn't that surprising.

loading replies

Highly recommend for anyone who loves history and/or period dramas. Sumptious, well-paced and balances look at the Russians Expresses years in power, including her beautiful love affair with Potemkin. Would definitely watch again.

loading replies

Catherine was only 33 when she was crowned...

loading replies

Helen Mirren for sure is one of the great actresses, there can't be any doubt about that. But for this role she's miscast. Since she was also Executive Producer my guess is there never was any other consideration.

Catherine was 33 when she became Empress. Helen Mirren is not portraying that being way in her 70s. While that shouldn't be important, it still is. It's hard to fathom why every man want's to sleep with her. When she is with Potemkin it looks more like mother and son then lovers. Now, I might be able to look past that but there is another matter.

What's the point of the show ? You don't learn much about the times or the characters. Most of the time it seems to be about sex anyway. And it looks like a low budget production, which seems odd for HBO. Furthermore it lacks enthusiasm, it feels shallow.

As much as I like to watch period drama, this one was like walking through mud.

loading replies

It's surprisingly funny, in a dark, sad and maybe accidental way. Give it a try, it's very entertaining.

loading replies
Loading...