Some films have patterns, and the pattern of this film is – a temporary mystical ability or inability ultimately changes the main character. The same pattern can be seen in Bruce Almighty or Liar, Liar, for instance. The funny thing about these movies is…in order for there to be a big enough difference in character, he or she has to be the complete opposite when the movie begins – to an almost unbelievable manner. Take Yes Man for instance (I know, I’m using way too many Jim Carrey references). In Yes Man, Jim says no to literally everything, it doesn’t make any real logical sense, it just helps the story progress when he needs to say yes to everything. In What Women Want, Mel Gibson is more than a womanizer, he doesn’t understand them, nor does he care to. He’s had a divorce and can’t even remember the age of his own daughter. They really wanted his character to be a sexist in every possible manner…but the weird thing is, out of all these mystical films, this introduction makes the most sense. We do live in a very sexist society – and as much fun as this film makes on the subject, it’s partially realistic.
The humor in this movie doesn’t hold up as much as I remember, it’s typical and makes sense, but otherwise…I didn’t really laugh. What’s surprising, on the other hand, is how deep it goes on an emotional level. Darcy, the CEO-type character, isn’t a cold-hearted nasty woman – as most women in her position are portrayed. She’s a kind, sweet, intelligent, and beautiful person…which is so different than what you’d see in practically any other film. Also, the relationship between Mel Gibson and the girl playing his daughter and the growth his character experiences with every scene is commendable. I really liked their chemistry. The best actor in the movie, in my opinion, was Judy Greer. She had a very small role, but it was very real, honest, and depressing – she was the balance this film needed and I wish they focused a little more on her part.
What Women Want won’t tell you what women want as much as tell you why they want it – or feel as if they need it. Underneath all the lackluster or otherwise cheesy comedic moments, there’s a surprisingly unmatched level of honesty and meaningful depth at the core that will stick with you for a while. Currently, you can watch it on Netflix, so give it a try if you haven’t seen it!
"Oh... This is nice, I don't understand why women complain about waxing."
Oh Mel. I was intrigued that a woman directed this. Goes to show we could have a sense of humor about ourselves back then. It did have a good message in it, but I think Mel Gibson is better off playing serious roles and not comedy.
I know by 2000 this must have been interesting and bold , but ugh, a man mansplaning women TO WOMEN. Shoot me. Makes me hope not a single man, not even trans or gay men are directing or pitching commericials "from the women perspective" (in the sort of Nike ad on this movie). That would be unlikely, but I rather not even look into it and hope that is true
It actually didn't dislike the movie, btw, I just can't belive how Nancy Meyers writes the most horrible male characters that deserve nothing and in the end she rewards them with getting what they want. (at least here and in Something's gotta give)
I found myself skipping through the bits at the beginning but enjoyed the second half much more than I usually do with early 2000s romcoms. Perhaps it was the female directing? Don't @ me tho
That being said, I do wish the main dude was NOT Mel Gibson lol
A little too crude and unrealistically forgiving at the end.
Shout by Miriam GoldmanBlockedParent2017-09-13T22:59:36Z
The nostalgia goggles are strong with this one. Romantic comedies will never be more entertaining than the ones that came out when you were nine years old.