All Comments about...

Rings 2017

3

Shout by Saint Pauly
BlockedParent2017-02-01T21:41:22Z— updated 2017-06-04T16:54:50Z

Do me a favour and don't see this because of me. That way I can feel I'm getting my revenge for sitting through an hour and a half of PG-13 boredom. I just hope they make another so I can not see it.

loading replies

It is not that bad, i mean is not a good movie, but it is better than the second one, I didn't like it but i didn't hate it.

loading replies

Really enjoyed this one. The mystery unravels and kept me on the edge of my seat awaiting the outcome. Well worth a watch. 8/10.

loading replies

It’s ok...watchable, but nothing new or fantastic.

loading replies

Well, not as bad as I thought it would be, keep your expectations below zero and you'll actually enjoy it and try not compare it to the first one (hard thing to do tho)

loading replies

this movie is stupid- what a waste of time. Rectal exams are more interesting than this.

loading replies

Really bad, pointless 'addition' to the faltering Rings franchise. Take my advice and skip this one... it will only make your eyes bleed!

loading replies

Don't watch it or you will die......of boredom,

loading replies

A waste of time. One of the few times I was almost leaving before the movie ended. Really, really boring with a non-sense story.

loading replies

Tries something different and has a somewhat better plot than the second one. Probably would have been better with Naomi Watts starring though. There's mostly a second rate cast with the exception of Vincent D'Onfrio and Johnny Galecki (The Big Bang Theory).
The movie kept my attention until it totally falls apart by the end.

loading replies

It was just so middle of the road. It wasn't good, it wasn't scary, it wasn't engaging, it wasn't so bad it's good, it was a sort of purgatory, I left the theater feeling no different than when i went in, but i did feel like i wasted my time.

loading replies

The third American film in the Ring series is somehow completely superfluous. The plot of the series just spins in circles. In "Rings", the premise is taken from the short film of the same name, but the actual plot then runs similarly to the rest of the movies. At its core, it's once again about learning more about Samara's past. And the more we learn with each film, the less interesting the character becomes. There is nothing left of the eerie atmosphere of the first movie here. The boredom is only interrupted by a few cheap jump scares. There is never any suspense, and the many plot holes contribute to that. The only truly positive aspect I can think of is that the likeable lead, Matilda Lutz, is pretty good, and the rest of the cast is also solid. However, that can't save the film either.

loading replies

This movie sucks with a very, "I've heard of this 'Ringu' thing from my nephew and want you to write an edgy new story for today's internet savvy kids" kind of energy. In reality, it's probably just Paramount trying to keep their rights to the IP, but it's clear that no one with a love of horror touched this film at any point. There's a neat idea at the core of it, but the bland characters and clumsy directing make leave it feeling heartless and shallow. Also, it has the squinty dude from the Bad Nerd Theory and I can't think of anything I hate more than that horeshit show and everybody in its orbit.

loading replies

Kind of boring and not scary at all. Super predictable!

loading replies

Rings attempts to reboot the franchise for the digital age and fails horribly. The story follows a teenage girl who attempts to save her boyfriend by coping and watching an infamous video that supposedly kills you seven days after watching it, however her digital copy turns out to contain additional footage that she comes to believe was meant for her; leading her to go in search of its meaning. Once again the series tries to make Samara a sympathetic victim, but it doesn’t work. Making the villain good and the good guy bad is a tried trope that’s been played out for a while now. And, the new powers given to Samara are extremely contrived. Also, the performances are incredibly poor, particularly the lead (who has no charisma). A second rate B-horror film, Rings is incredibly dull and nonsensical.

loading replies

Really enjoyed it. Not as creepy as it's predecessors, but fills in a ton of back story.

loading replies

I'm glad "f**k you! It's January" is still around-

Wait a minute...

loading replies

This makes the Ring Two look like the Sistine Chapel in comparison.

loading replies

horrible movie. like the old one.

loading replies

It's so bad that I didn't even blink during the jumpscares. :yawn:
Bad acting, bad writing, bad dialogue; it's just a terrible movie!

loading replies

Not as good as I had hoped, a few jump scares, and an okay-ish storyline but just didnt keep me gripped

loading replies

Much better than I thought it would be. I didn't expect much though. It has that creepy vibe but it's also kinda interesting. Funny seeing Leonard in it as well.

loading replies

Don't waste your time unnecessarily

loading replies

Waste of time really, I was hoping for a twisted plot... Little made sense, not scarey at all

loading replies

Good job turning a horror classic into a trite flick.

loading replies

I feel magnanimous and I'm gonna put 2 instead of 1 just because I liked the scenes from the "new" tape.
This is one of the most boring and pointless movie I think I've ever seen in my life, completely waste of time, it doesn't even have good scene or involontary comedy/trash, nothing: this movie is nothing.
Save at least your hour and half of your seven days' week.

loading replies

I agree with the people in the comments. If I hadn't seen the original movies of the franchise, it would be an okay horror flick I guess. I remember what a fresh feel the original asian "The Ring": Great acting, good story, great actors. Overall great package. This movie is a remake of the successfull franchise and.. well it failed. Some people say it was good but when you ask them if they have ever seen the original films most haven't. Especially the acting is extremely weak here, as the viewer is given no character you actually care about. A disappointment. :(

loading replies

Pretty lousy. Revisionist crap that doesn't do anything new or even remotely scary or interesting with this once great franchise. Filled largely with an uninteresting cast who you don't care about, doing a bunch of illogical nonsense. And that opening..? Ugh! Why does current studio horror try to squeeze in these over-the-top action sequences?! THIS crap is what we were basing the viability of old horror coming back?! For shame.

loading replies

Shout by Deleted

No matter what you think, genius casting--Leonard and Falling Water's Tess...love that.

loading replies

Lame story and just completely boring. The only good thing about this movie is seeing Johnny Galecki in something other than The Big Bang Theory.

Don't watch this movie! (although, like the people in this movie, you will probably probably ignore my advice and watch it anyway :) )

loading replies

Unbelievably disappointing. I wish it had jump scares so I could tell people that I got scared but nope. Don't watch it.

loading replies

Totally trash, don't worth!

loading replies
Loading...