John Rambo!! Silvester Stallone is awesome!!
"I'll take football."
"What is football? You play with your foot?"
"Not really."
LOL
And I've always remembered that scene with the curious kid asking John Rambo about his knife and luck pendant.
Rambo 3 is a fun, action-packed adventure that delivers exactly what it promises: an over-the-top spectacle with a hint of political commentary. It won't win awards for its originality or character development, but it's a satisfying entry for fans of the Rambo franchise and 80s action cinema in general. Just be prepared for a film that leans more towards explosions than emotional depth.
Rambo
First Blood(1982) https://trakt.tv/movies/first-blood-1982
Rambo: First Blood Part II (1985) https://trakt.tv/movies/rambo-first-blood-part-ii-1985
Rambo III (1988) https://trakt.tv/movies/rambo-iii-1988
Rambo (2008) https://trakt.tv/movies/rambo-2008
Rambo: Last Blood (2019) https://trakt.tv/movies/rambo-last-blood-2019
ok but the firs ttwo where much bette rsome parts are silly in this movie and story is not good...
"What is it." - "Blue light" - "And what does it do?" - "It turns blue"
At least in Germany this is one of the best known movie quotes that even people know who have never seen any of the movies in this movie series. After the excellent "First Blood" (10/10) and the rather disastrous sequel "Rambo - First Blood Part 2" (4/10), we get third installment "Rambo III", in which John Rambo has retired in Thailand, living peacefully among monks. However, when his former commander gets captured and his fate is left to him, Rambo decides to get active once more. He travels to Afghanistan and is aided by Afghan Mujahideen (i.e. people engaged in Jihad) who during the time of the cold war where of course supported by the U.S. army in their fight against the invading Russians under their communist regime.
Different to the last movie, this one is really good once again, even though in general there are a few parallels to the last movie: Rambo has to meet up with his contact, find a prison camp, sneak in, and get out the prisoner, which does not work right from the beginning, so he has to return, fight some more enemies until he can safe the prisoners. However, this time it's really captivating. The plot is sound, there aren't many plot holes, the action good, and not as overdone as in Part 2 - even though it's probably more. The enemy is interesting as well, and not as stupid as in the last movie. We also get some thrilling sneak and hide scenes, and a lot clever usages of blue light :D They are also hopelessly outnumbered, take some hits. Yet the body count is probably equally high as in the predecessor, and there are a number of rather innovative killing scenes that are really fun to watch.
Plus we also get some decent tag alongs that can actually pull their weight, have more personality and that actually have some chemistry with Rambo. So to me, while it cannot get near to the first movie in any way, it is still a solid, fun to watch and also fun to re-watch typical action movie that is captivating and never boring. Even though its a 102 minutes long time really passes by - something I could not say about the second installment that over long parts was boring and where I was often looking at the blu-ray counter to see how long it would still last.
And thankfully there wasn't yet another bad attempt to copy the ingenious monologue scene from the end of the first movie. Instead we get a text card just before the credits roll in:
"This film is dedicated to the gallant people of Afghanistan"
For today's standards this seems rather awkward, but keep remembering: It where other times back then.
I need luck.. ken I hev it?
Trautman: "Can you fly that helicopter?"
Rambo: "Let's find out!"
Even more muscle and hair, Stallone was really jacked up in this one, ready to fight the Terminator. Rambo III is a step down from it's predecessors but the action is what made it a decent watch. It had a few quiet moments in the first half but the second half is pretty much non-stop action. Some of the sequences are forgettable and generic but others like the horse battle and especially the tank vs. helicopter was very memorable and epic. Lots of quality explosions, the grenade hole kill in the third act was my favorite.
For the character of John Rambo it isn't the best movie though. Rambo gets a child sidekick and I thought it was a great opportunity to give layers to the character but I don't think we got nearly enough interactions between the two (or with any other character). The PTSD is mentionned at the beginning but is forgotten after that. The story leans more on the silly side too.
First Blood 10/10
Rambo 7/10
Rambo III 6/10.
From now on, the series gets really stupid. The introduction to this film in particular has been parodied dozens of times, and not without reason. John Rambo is no longer a character here, but a caricature. In the lead role, Sylvester Stallone also appears to be bored. In Tango & Cash, which was released a year later, he himself says, "Rambo is a pussy." And who knows, besides the weak financial results, there might be other reasons why the fourth one took way longer.
Anyway, at the beginning of Rambo III, our protagonist lives in a Thai monastery. He also keeps in shape by participating in stick fights. Stallone doesn't have an ounce of body fat here. He is shredded and looks like a machine. But the peaceful life doesn't stick. Rambo at first refuses a request from his former superior, Colonel Trautman, to accompany him on a mission to Afghanistan. But when Trautman is taken prisoner, that is it for Rambo's retirement.
The antagonists this time are the Russians, who still have control over Afghanistan. Rambo is supported by the mujahideen, who are presented as honorable and proud fighters for freedom. It should be clear to everyone that all of this has not aged well from today's perspective. However, I still find it fascinating to watch films like The Living Daylights or Rambo III that are set in Afghanistan in the 1980s.
In any case, the action starts in Afghanistan at some point, even if it takes quite a while. The tempo, however, is extremely slow. To make matters worse, the dialogue is all hollow and unintentionally funny. It's not all entertaining. The villains are even more faceless than in Part 2.
But now back to the positive: The action is convincing once again. At the time of its release, "Rambo III" was the most expensive film of all time, and it shows. In the finale, there are numerous bombastic explosions. Pyrotechnics are used again and again. In addition, masses of extras are employed. And the stuntmen probably had to work overtime. It's all of high quality and leaves you in the end with a good feeling from the finale of this original trilogy.
An under-rated 3rd film that is better than the last two Rambos. Since it remembers to not take itself too seriously. Even if a lot of it feels like Rambo 2 all over again. With a villain who can conveniently fly a helicopter.
The newer movies also aren’t as good without Richard Crenna. Who died a couple of years before Rambo 4.
John Rambo unleashes hell once more in Rambo III. After Col. Trautman is captured by the Soviets while running a covert mission in Afghanistan, Rambo comes to his rescue and kills anything that gets in his way. Unfortunately the film is extremely plot heavy, making for a rather boring adventure. Additionally, the action is pretty mindless, and has no intensity or excitement to it. Underwhelming and rather dull, Rambo III is a disappointing sequel that doesn't live up to its predecessors.
It's more of the second one but not as good of action or story.
Someone must have been thinking "that middle section from part II was good, let's make that into another movie". There are obviously many similar scenes. And why not ? At least here the Russians don't feel misplaced.
They were painting them as evil as they possibly can. And they are using every cliché in the book. Well, it was still the Cold War and that`s what people wanted to see.
Despite all of that this is still a good action movie where almost everything looks so much better than a lot of the one's that came after this one. Here's to practical photography.
Again, this doesn't reach at part one and for me that is mostly attributed to the fact, that in the first the action served the delivery of the message. It now feels like the message is the excuse for the action.
Heck, still aged much better than I thought it would and some of the one-liners are still homeruns.
Imagen 3,5/5 and sound 4/5. It is curious that the bad ones are the Russian and the good Afghans, seen now
Shout by Marc FriedolinVIP 6BlockedParent2018-11-22T21:45:57Z
Kind of ironic watching late 80ies movies about afghanistan today, knowing how it turns out in the end...