Movie making at it's best! Where to start? Hitchcock spun brilliance. Stellar cast, phenomenal performances: Cary Grant never misses a beat, James Mason is ruthless, Martin Landau is menacing, Leo G. Carroll obfuscates, but Eva Marie Saint is the fulcrum of the piece with her powerful, skilled, nuanced performance, perfectly balancing confidence, vulnerability and passion. The cinematography is vivid. The colour is glorious. Hitchcock at his best (did you catch his cameo?). Of course I rate this film a 10 (the best) out of 10. [Mystery, Intrigue, Suspense]
Guh. I wrote a comment and then it disappeared. Anyway, this movie is amazing. Cary Grant at his best, Eva Marie Saint at her best, Hitchcock at his best. Just miles better than Vertigo, btdubs, but I'm not here to throw stones. One thing that is hysterical/horrible is the fact that the woman who played Cary Grant's mother WAS NINE MONTHS YOUNGER THAN HIM. Man. That poor actress!
Hitchcock is one of my favorite directors (like that's uncommon) because he is so unorthodox in both his storytelling and in his use and positioning of his camera. Everything he made has something in it that makes it special or even unusual. This is probably one of his more pedestrian looking films, but there's still plenty of visual wonders scattered about.
This plays like an early Bond to me. Cary Grant is smooth as silk even though he's learning the spy game as he goes. He's got a quip for any situation. Eva Marie Saint isn't my favorite Hitchcock blonde, but she's still a good one. I love the cropduster scene. What a great use of sound and never has a farm field looked so panoramic.
This is an exciting early action movie. The only thing that drags down my personal rating is the final chase scene on Mt. Rushmore. It isn't really that gripping and it even meanders. The final moment of the film is jarring but in the happiest way possible.
"North By Northwest" is another example of an older film that I wish could be given the opportunity to be viewed by today's younger audiences. How is it possible not to think Cary Grant's Roger Thornhill is one of the coolest men to ever glide across a screen?
I found this rather boring.
"No, they didn't give me a chaser"
North by Northwest is the most fun Alfred Hitchcock movie. Never a dull moment in this one and watching it again is just as fun as the first, second and third time.
Anyway, North by Northwest is Hitchcock's action, adventure comedy and it fires on all cylinders. The cast is great starring Cary Grant, Eva Marie Saint, James Mason and Jessie Royce Landis. Cary Grant especially seems to have so much fun and it shows. I just love his scenes where he is drunk!
And the story just strings you along with Hitchcock's masterful direction. Have you spotted him? The final scene at Mount Rushmore, the scene with the plane, the drunken chase, everything is shot so well.
North by Northwest is just one of those films you have to watch. You'll fall in love with Cary Grant, one of the most versatile actors, you see a different side of Hitchcock, a more fun one and those 135 minutes will just fly by.
A classic.
A classic with a great story. Reminds me of horror flicks in black and white that had no special effects, can still be thrilling. But one thing, what is it with fight scenes in old movies? Get hit and instant knock out in slow motion while stretching out in a weird way while falling down? Never understood that...
North by Northwest is more than a film; it's a masterclass in cinema that showcases Alfred Hitchcock's unparalleled ability to merge narrative innovation with visual spectacle. This cinematic cornerstone intricately weaves suspense, romance, and wit into a narrative that captivates and challenges audiences, contending for the title of Hitchcock's magnum opus alongside Rear Window, Vertigo, and Psycho.
Ernest Lehman's masterfully crafted screenplay keeps viewers engaged, inviting them to unravel the mystery alongside the protagonist, Cary Grant's Roger Thornhill. Grant's portrayal is nothing short of iconic, bringing the necessary charm and sophistication to make his character's extraordinary predicament deeply engaging. As Thornhill finds himself embroiled in a web of espionage and danger due to mistaken identity, the film navigates through its complex narrative with a gripping pace that defines Hitchcock's oeuvre.
Eva Marie Saint, as Eve Kendall, adds depth and intrigue, and her performance weaves complexity and allure into the fabric of the story. The cinematography, especially notable in sequences like the crop-dusting plane attack and the Mount Rushmore chase, demonstrates Hitchcock's genius in uniting narrative with visual storytelling to create indelible cinematic moments.
Reflecting on the film within the context of its 1959 release, it's clear that audiences witnessing it for the first time would have been treated to an experience unrivaled in its originality, deserving a 10/10 rating. The innovative plot twists, the breathtaking cinematography, and the seamless blend of suspense and romance were revolutionary, setting a standard for thrillers that would follow.
However, viewing North by Northwest for the first time in 2024, one's initial impressions cannot escape being somewhat diluted by exposure to the endless iterations and homages this Hitchcock masterpiece has inspired over the decades. The film's influence is so pervasive in the thriller genre that modern audiences might find its once revolutionary elements familiar, if not somewhat anticipated.
Yet, this does not diminish the film's status as a seminal work of art. Reflecting on North by Northwest, the portrayal of the world in 1959 offers a fascinating glimpse into the era's aesthetics and societal norms. This serves as a captivating window into the past and underscores the film's timeless appeal, showcasing Hitchcock's genius in creating a narrative that resonates across generations.
In conclusion, while the impact of North by Northwest may be tempered by the passage of time and the evolution of the genre it helped define, its sophistication, suspense, and humor remain potent, proving that Hitchcock's vision continues to enthral and inspire. It stands as a monumental achievement, a testament to storytelling's power, and a vibrant snapshot of 1959, captivating in its time and enduring in its legacy.
2024 First Watch Rating: 8/10
Rewatchable? Absolutely. While the initial shock of its innovations may be softened by familiarity, the depth of its artistry and the joy of its execution invite us back, time and again, to marvel at Hitchcock's masterful creation. North by Northwest remains a luminous beacon in film history, its legacy as captivating now as it was at its inception.
Fun movie! I’m hesitant with most classic movies, but this one was actually a joy to watch. It reminds me of an old Bond-movie in a way. That might be the effects, though.
Anyway, it holds up pretty good for a 64 year old movie! It has some amazing shots, but the story, with some twists and turns, is the clear winner for me. I can honestly say that I didn’t get bored once.
I do think this movie is the predecessor of the commercial cinemas where heroes are mistaken for somebody else.Yet the hand of Hitchcock made it a lovable watch and didn't give the chance to feel clichéd.Especially the outdoor sequences seemed so extraordinarily crafted that it felt almost like a modern day film.That's why I love the work of Alfred Hitchcock so much.
An influential classic for the ages. 10/10 masterpiece.
Great, scene of a plane, chasing Cary Grant in a cornfield.
The action scenes are hilarious, but the rest is still incredibly fresh and engaging. With its dense script, perfect pacing, and sophisticated direction, "North by Northwest" is the synthesis of Hitch's style up to that point. It puts together most of his usual tropes: an ordinary person getting involved in a crime, mistaken identity, MacGuffins, alcohol, inept policemen, witty humor, a mysterious blonde, etc. In a way, it's also a precursor to the James Bond movies. Things get a bit too silly at times, but nothing we can't forgive if we consider the overall playful tone.
I know it's not uncommon for old films, but the actress playing Cary Grant's mother was just a few years older than him. What were they thinking??
Possibly the best mistaken identity movie ever made. Though critics at the time, called it typical Hitchcock. Would let him go trying something different, like Psycho.
By modern standards, this is too slow and a little corny... But that misses the point.
This film is evident in the DNA of most modern thrillers. The Bourne franchise, Tom Cruise's Mission Impossible films, virtually any cold war film. They all owe a debt to this masterpiece.
Hitchcock nails the direction with brilliant set pieces and iconic locations. Grant is a fantastic film star but his humour here is his greatest asset. The score is brilliantly apt.
It's a 60 year old film yet it could rival much of the genre that is released nowadays. When it came out, it was not only Hitchcock's finest work (yep, better than Vertigo) but probably the best action thriller to date.
What a fabulous film that is holding up extremely well despite the ravages of time.
8.25/10
Hitchcock's suspenseful mistaken-identity classic remains daring, original and vibrant enough to hang with the big boys of the modern age. Cary Grant may have been a few years too old for this leading role, but the fast-paced, ever-intensifying script that envelopes him never gives us the chance to sit and stew on it.
The concept that powers the whole bag is astonishingly simple, and once it's knocked out of the way in the first act, the picture is then perfectly happy to gradually up the stakes and riff on the premise for the rest of its allotted time. It's a testament to the creativity of the filmmakers that it still feels so fresh and untainted today, in the era of the derivative knock-off, with only a few dated automobiles and touches of public etiquette reminding us it's actually closing in on sixty years of age. Classic, timeless action / adventure / suspense.
A great movie, but I can't help but not love it completely because the train flirting is awful and corny but in a painful way, not a funny way. That, and the ending, like many Hitchcock films, is absolutely terrible and anticlimactic. All I've learned from marathoning some Hitchcock films these past few weeks is he can make great films, but can't make an ending at all.
Still worth a watch for sure, I'm just bitter.
This would had a higher rating had the ending not completely blown. It is kind of sad that the female lead went from being in On the Waterfront to this movie to... being Cybil Sheperd's mother on Moonlighting.
follow me at https://IHateBadMovies.com
Image 4/5 and sound 3/5. Alfred Hitchcock's magnificent film, with great dialogues and plans
Another one of the great classics watched and ticked off my list.
Couple questions though. Why did he not drive the car through the wooden gates? And what about that ending? Slightly rushed imo. Otherwise a great film.
É um ótimo filme, mas senti falta do toque de suspense que o Hitchcock sabe fazer tão bem... Os principais clássicos dele são sufocantes em quase sua totalidade, mas esse pega mais para o lado da aventura. Não deuxa de ser um ótimo filme, mas faltou um pouco mais da presença do Mestre do Suspense
8/10
A Hitchcock classic that is heart pounding suspense start to finish.
The template which so many crime thrillers have since aspired to, what is striking is how well Hitchcock balances the lighter elements and humour of the story, the more serious mystery plot and the action sequences. In Cary Grant, he has the perfect lead for this and Roger Thornhill is the quintessential Grant character, who can trade wit and humour with Eve Marie Saint and convince as man on the run for his life. The action sequences may look dated, but they serve as a reminder that action can still be exciting and interesting if the script and performances convince the audience to care about the characters involved - take note, Michael Bay!!
What a thrilling adventure! An exciting and suspenseful story where theres always an interesting thing going on. Great story, great dialogue, great sets and cinematography, great acting. It's great fun! Another one from Hitchcock that I loved.
Cary Grant is perfect for the role of Roger Thornhill, an average man who turns into a spy without even knowing. He is charming, intelligent and funny. The drunk scene was great and the famous crop dusting sequence is amazing, brilliantly done!
Review by Andrew BloomVIP 9BlockedParent2017-01-12T21:42:36Z
7.9/10. Whenever I watch classic films, I cannot help but think about “The Citizen Kane Effect” – the idea that venerated works of art can seem ho-hum to a modern-day viewer because their innovations that wowed contemporary audiences have become commonplace. And I also think about my friend and film critic Andy Roth’s response that the term was inapt, because even apart from its many innovations, Citizen Kane was a sound, well-crafted bit of storytelling.
That’s where I am with North by Northwest one of the most lauded films in cinema history that inhabits the rarified are of the silver screen’s Great Works. And yet, in an era of film where a series of dramatic twists and regular joes getting mixed up in the extraordinary in a movie have become commonplace, if not tired tropes, North by Northwest certainly still seems good to a modern viewer, or at least this modern viewer, but for a film with such a pedigree, it can no longer wow. That’s no sin for anything but the best-regarded films.
And yet, to Mr. Roth’s point, even stripped of that pedigree, and the expectations that come with, North by Northwest is a thoroughly well-made film, with good pacing, thrilling set pieces, heightened intrigue, and twists and turns to recontextualize events and reenergize the proceedings as necessary. The film is flawless, not in the sense that it is perfect or exceptional, but in the sense that there’s little, if anything, to point to that North by Northwest does poorly. It just doesn’t inspire much passion in an era littered with imitators of the film’s imitators.
But what does stand out, even half a century later when green screens and CGI have allowed directors of photography to depict anything you can imagine, is the visual virtuosity that Hitchcock puts on display. The cornfield scene in North by Northwest is iconic for a reason, but beyond the action and the drama is the imagery that conveys it. The way Hitchcock and cinematographer Robert Burks play with perspective, using grand sweeping shots of the plane in the distance looming larger and more ominous with each pass, the way the frame is blanketed in white at the same time the protagonist is, and the dramatic cuts as Thornhill flags down a doomed tanker serves to create an exhilarating scene that communicates the stakes and the danger of the moment without the tools of modern day filmmaking.
That also speaks to the fim’s (and one of Hitchcock’s) greatest strengths -- the ability to create mood. The viewer feels Thornhill’s paranoia as he’s thrust into a case of mistaken identity, feeling bewildered and overwhelmed at the threats, espionage, and intrigue unfurling around him at an ever-increasing pace. The final setpiece, with the cat and mouse game set at Mount Rushmore, uses that setting and the score, not to mention the way the action is framed, to create an ongoing tension and drama throughout. And The scenes between Thornhill and Eve Kendall evoke a charged passion, coupled with playfulness, that emerges between two people on the run, each not really knowing whether they can trust the other.
The love story between them is odd by modern standards, but works for the film’s purposes. Considering the compressed timeline of the film, their romance happens very quickly, and their back-and-forth banter is left to do the heavy lifting when mood doesn’t suffice. That banter vacillates between charm and cheese. Still, it fits the story and the surroundings, and it’s a reminder how the Tarantinos, Sorkins, and Whedons of the modern day were, at least to some degree, following the classic blueprint for stylized dialogue with their trademark forms of patter.
Beyond the dialogue, North by Northwest is an extremely well-written film in terms of its story, pacing, and plot. Each of the reveals have their seeds planted early, to where when the twists come, it’s an “aha” moment rather than a “huh?” moment. That’s what distinguishes the film from the many movies today, particularly blockbusters, that traffic in the same sort of secret identity and mystery box storytelling. While several films include a twist for twists sake, meant to allow the picture to coast on the shock of the reveal alone, North by Northwest takes the time to set up the important details and hints at the truth, so that when everything falls into place, it feels like a natural extension of what’s come before rather than a radical shift out of nowhere.
The only problem, relative to other movies in Hitchcock’s filmography, is that North by Northwest isn’t really about anything. It’s simply a well-plotted thrillride, which is the sort of faint praise one might wish to be damned with. There are hints here and there at a larger point. If there is a theme to the film, it’s that ordinary men can accomplish extraordinary things, particularly when they are motivated by love (or, if you’re a cynic, lust).
When we meet Roger Thornhill, is a smooth-talking gentleman, twice divorced, who seems no sooner to become embroiled in the world of spooks and spies than he does to become an astronaut. But when accidentally embroiled in this near-fatal misunderstanding, he answers the call, and in the process, finds talents, and a partner who appreciates them, that seemed to elude him before.
For the most part though, that’s window dressing on an exciting adventure that slowly unspools with enough dramatic twists to keep things humming. That’s no crime. If the most a movie can boast is that it entertains the audience, has a tightly-written screenplay, and enough character moments to make its grand set pieces have impact beyond the spectacle of them, it’s doing quite alright. North by Northwest only suffers for being a part of the canon, that ineffable signifier of greatness that tells latter-day audiences what they’re watching is supposed to be a knock-your-socks-off masterpiece, leaving many of them, myself included, mildly disappointed at a film that is simply great rather than transcendent. Somehow, I don’t think Hitchcock would cry many tears over that assessment.