Very much a slow-burn mood-board of a movie, John and the Hole portrays the hastened death of modern adolescence in a suffocating, eerie directorial debut from Pascual Sisto. All the stages we go through upon reaching adulthood (eating whatever we want, buying whatever we want, doing whatever we want until the eventual snapback of reality puts us in our place) are visualised here in a creeping, droning style that is oppressive as much as it is unsettling. Much to muse over, and might even make my second viewing list, but a difficult recommendation to those who are not accepting of arthouse heavy features.
Edit: I wrote up a few things on Reddit which I'll share here. These are my interpretations of the plot and what the movie is truly about. Spoilers will be discussed, so please refrain from reading until after watching the movie!
My interpretation is that the movie is a mood piece about the death of adolescence and how the ending of childhood is hastened for some people. It's a visualisation of the "coming to terms" we all go through at different times of our life when we finally hand the baton on from being a child to being an adult.
When John is told what it's like to be an adult, a hole inside him is opened as he realises that he will have to make his own way, make his own decisions, take on all the responsibilities that come with being an adult. This is visualised in the movie via the bunker/hole John finds near the house. This turns John into an apathetic husk as it dawns on him what the next stage of life brings. This "awakening" is visualised by him putting his family in the hole, a dramatised way of us leaving our families to find ourselves and what we want to do in life.
John then goes through the stages I think most go through when they find themselves in "adulthood" and the freedom it brings as apposed to childhood. He eats anything and everything he wants, he buys all the material things he can afford and does only the things he wants to do (play the piano, listen to classical music, play video games and eat pizza). Then he realises that he cannot continue to do only what he wants to. He must find the balance between what he wants to do, what he needs to do and what he's supposed to do. We see the messy, awkward fumbling of someone trying to find their way with many scenes throughout, from John trying to hit on his mothers friend, to him finally putting down the chicken nuggies and teaching himself to cook risotto.
Once he's had this rocky coming-of-age, John returns to his family and frees them from the hole. He's found himself, his childhood is now over, and he must go forward as an "adult". I'm not sure if it's inferred in the final dinner scene that none of this actually took place, that all this was in Johns head during the table scene earlier when his sister ran off to be with her boyfriend? I'd have to rewatch to confirm, but that would be my take away.
As far as the off-shoot subplot, I think that's actually the main plot of the movie, and the mother in that plot is telling her daughter the story of John to prepare her for the walkout she's about to do.
Really solid movie, but a difficult one to recommend if you're not into moodboard/arthouse-y films.
What a waste of my life.....
It puts the lotion on its skin or the family goes in the pit again
More like 'John and the Hole Lotta Nothing'...
A chilling twist on Home Alone. An unusual film but commendably made.
Seeing the trailer i thought immediately about "We need to talk about Kevin" which was superb!
boy what a totally disappointment. ok please don't start the whole artistic approach and a genius director that gave a film that you cannot understand. There is a big difference between not knowing if the coin stops spinning and from this. What is the answer then ? 80 minutes of no dialogue only stupid things
Was it all on his head ? no ? if no it didn't make any sense. Yes, again no sense
WHAT WAS THE SUBPLOT !?!?!!!? a woman that perhaps on a nice ending could be his sister. a little girl at the end finds herself on the same woods. If it was a dream or a story then the scene of someone filing and closing the hole would never happen.
There is no answer, only speculations and i don't know if the director even gave one or that i actually care for one.
Can't believe I wasted 1 hour and 43 mins of my life on this. I kept waiting for something to happen and it never really did. And what was with the other little girl? Was it meant to portray the absolute opposite of John? Very bizarre film.
Sequence error (scratches on arms 0:14:10).
Confusing and pointless subplot.
A piece of shit.
This movie is definitely not going to be for everyone.
It is very creepy and disturbing. Shotwell does a really good job here.
How I rate:
1-3 :heart: = seriously! don't waste your time
4-6 :heart: = you may or may not enjoy this
7-8 :heart: = I expect you will like this too
9-10 :heart: = movies and TV shows I really love!
Shout by DiegoBlockedParentSpoilers2022-07-15T20:43:39Z
Very good cinematography, shot and directed well. Mostly interesting for a slow burn. Disgruntled kid tests sleeping pills on gardener before dosing family, putting them in a neighboring basement of an abandoned property.. Just waiting for the end for a point to it. The "why". Why would he do this to his seemingly loving, stable family? Is there an ugly dark family secret ? Is he being (insert dark imaginations)?? Then with the end comes the big surprise boom. The kid's just a neurotic little kook feeling the coming pressures of adulthood. No point, no secretes, and no punishment. No point at all. Then there's the sequences that kept shifting to the 12 year old girl plot. Another pretentious director thinking his ending is artsy and the audience will somehow get "it", his big mysterious duality audiences will surely embrace. Only there is no it.