Wisely retaining the visual aesthetic of Azkaban, albeit with a little more colour, this does lack the visual flourishes and background details that characterised the previous entry. The filmmakers have also recognised the need to streamline Rowling’s novels and keep the focus largely on Harry, though Brendan Gleeson is also a great addition to the secondary characters as Moody. It’s a shame then that a large portion of the plot focuses on a tournament that offers very little except some fun set pieces and the coming of age themes involving teenage jealousy, friendship difficulties and attraction don’t feel as integrated into the plot as last time. Part of the problem is that much of this feels largely inconsequential to the impending return of Voldemort. His return has been teased for three entries and right from the start, it’s clear the film is building to it. Fortunately, the final portion of the film doesn’t disappoint and Ralph Fiennes is deliciously arrogant, evil and appears to be having a great time. There is an intensity and ultimately a sadness to the end of the film as the central trio are faced with mortality and death that takes the series forward into more uncertain times and a recognition that a darker more adult world awaits them beyond the seemingly safe confines of their environment.
Some good and some bad. The pacing issues are understandable, as the fourth book was the longest yet in the series and they still had to cram it into a 2.5-hour movie. A major continuity error (the awning ripped in half by Harry's dragon magically is repaired for a later wide shot) and incorrect application of the Expelliarmus spell (Krum is still holding his wand after landing on his back, unconscious) drag it down a bit, as do editing shortcuts that mangle character in a few spots.
Now, maybe it’s because I’m reading through the books and then watching the respective movies and just haven’t noticed in previous viewings, but I feel like this movie furthest deviates from the novel. For so much content, and even entire characters, to be left out bemuses me. I think Bagman would’ve added a great level of humour to the movie.
I also think that Hollywood forgot that the Triwizard Tournament is supposed to be a spectator sport. When all three tasks are completely unwatchable, I would’ve been a very disgruntled spectator.
Aside from my criticisms, I loved the movie. Madeye (but not) is so funny and it amuses me how much Rupert Grint obviously had a growth spurt and left the others behind.
It's nice to see that the film's are maturing in terms of their content. Seen as though, at the time of their release, the main trio of characters were growing up with our audience demographic it is nice to see it age content wise aswell. This is a really good Harry Potter, though not my favourite.
Maybe it‘s because I just re-read the novel before watching it again, but this movie is jarring in its simplicity compared to the book. I get that you can‘t cram all the contents of almost 800 pages into a normal-length film, and some plot points need to be made more plain because exposition isn‘t as easy in this medium*, but it felt like they left out some scenes for budget reasons (like the world cup) but then over-dramatised scenes which didn‘t really need it (like the first task) or added completely superfluous ones (like the dance scene) - and of course, there‘s the parts changed for no conceivable reason, like the Beauxbatons/Durmstrang gender separation (are there no male French wizards??), the maze (surely the special effects budget was taxed just as much by this as it would have been by a Sphinx?) and the much-criticised angry!Dumbledore.
*I get leaving out Bertha Jorkins or Neville giving Harry the Gillyweed, for example, it‘s unnecessarily convoluted for a movie, but I hate the parts where they change things for „clarity“ (because they think viewers are idiots) and then ruin the whole point - like Polyjuice Potion not transforming your voice, which they thankfully changed for this movie, or someone‘s eyes glazing over under the Imperius Curse (despite Moody saying you couldn‘t tell who was under its influence).
If they can take memories from your head in our them in a bowl so someone else can look at it… why not do they to the prisoners or Harry to prove peoples innocence O_o…
First Ron was upset that Harry got in over him but then Ron eventually gas lights Harry to feel bad about it and move on from it O_o
Wanna see my charmed long staff?
The first Harry Potter movie that I saw. I liked it that much that I started reading the books immediately!
The scene where the other schools arrive at Hogwarts is so weird when you think about it. They're just putting on these dramatic performances out of nowhere.
Also, did none of the teachers question what Moody was drinking? Were they all just happy thinking that he was a raging alcoholic?
Anyway, this is a great movie. Definitely in the top two or three of the franchise, and maybe even my favourite.
Finally Voldemort appears. I too wish they explored the world of the other schools . I felt like they rushed the tournament. Great movie though. Waiting to see what lord Voldemort does now that he failed to kill Harry Potter twice
I just don’t know with this one. Didn’t like it back in the day, and that’s still the case now.
The directing and visuals are a major step down from Cuaron, though it still maintains a lot of its gothic style.
Some of the acting choices are highly questionable. I’m not just talking about that one scene with Dumbledore that got memed to death, but also some of the choices made by Brendan Gleeson and David Tennant can be a bit much. Still, even Mike Newell can’t get a bad performance out of Maggie Smith and Alan Rickman, so there’s that.
The first act feels rushed as hell, it’s pushing through way too much stuff. Take the Quidditch World Cup. Not only is it a bummer that we don't get to see the interesting stuff (the match), but the attack that follows isn't very well done either. The blocking is super awkward, the way it’s edited and put together looks sloppy, the scene doesn’t breathe. To me, this film doesn’t really find its groove until that first classroom scene with Moody. From there on, it’s a mixed bag. Some of the spectacle’s fun and well done, but there are also some moments that feel cringy. That might be intentional, as the main characters are teenagers, but there’s something about the directing and dialogue that feels off.
When it comes to the characters, I do think this film has some major building blocks for the journeys of Harry, Ron and Hermoine as characters, and that’s all pretty well handled. However, none of the other champions are even remotely interesting, and that sucks because Robbert Pattinson’s probably the most important part for the emotional core of this film, so his big moments don’t hit as hard as they should.
In essence, it’s still competent, but I think it made a lot of the wrong choices and ends up being very flawed.
5/10
I know it's a long movie already and the book was also very long but they missed SO much out of the movie. There were so many scenes that would have made the film so much better and would have provided people who don't read the books with better content and more information and context of the trio's fourth year.
63 | Every year since Harry arrived dangerous things always happened in Hogwarts. Probably Harry should reconsider moving to another wizarding school. This film seems to have more budget than the previous films. The quidditch world cup was so majestic and exciting to watch. Not long after that, the main focus of the story appears which is Harry Potter's main villain. We learned that from the tournament held by three schools. It was a ridiculous tournament because of how dangerous it was. They literary tried to kill their students. It was even funnier when they said it was to strengthen the school's friendship. Fortunately, the writing was the only bad thing in this film. Other than that, the acting, production design, and the directing were good, not great but good enough. The next film would be very interesting after the dark lord himself comeback.
••••••••••••••••••••
Rating: 62.71
Plot
P1: 1.3
P2: 1.0
P3: 0.7
P4: 1.5
Director: Mike Newell
Favorite Characters
1.6: Brendan Gleeson as Barty Crouch Junior
1.4: Ralph Fiennes as Lord Voldemort
1.2: Daniel Radcliffe as Harry Potter
1.1: Robert Pattinson as Cedric Diggory
0.9: Rupert Grint as Ron Weasley
0.8: Emma Watson as Hermione Granger
Written by Kornelius Harda Wicaksana
I didn’t expect to see Dr. Who in Harry Potter. But, it was nice.
The Harry Potter series
Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone (2001) https://trakt.tv/movies/harry-potter-and-the-philosopher-s-stone-2001
Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets (2002) https://trakt.tv/movies/harry-potter-and-the-chamber-of-secrets-2002
Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban (2004) https://trakt.tv/movies/harry-potter-and-the-prisoner-of-azkaban-2004
Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire (2005) https://trakt.tv/movies/harry-potter-and-the-goblet-of-fire-2005
Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix (2007) https://trakt.tv/movies/harry-potter-and-the-order-of-the-phoenix-2007
Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince (2009) https://trakt.tv/movies/harry-potter-and-the-half-blood-prince-2009
Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part 1 (2010) https://trakt.tv/movies/harry-potter-and-the-deathly-hallows-part-1-2010
Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part 2 (2011) https://trakt.tv/movies/harry-potter-and-the-deathly-hallows-part-2-2011
Still a little disjointed, but tonally it’s definitely the most consistent since the first movie. “The Prisoner of Azkaban” helped set the right mood, but still felt kind of lost in between a child story and a teenage action-adventure. Sure, teen drama can be too much to handle for old farts like myself, but I am clearly out of the target demographic so whatever.
It looks like many fans hated it because they cut too many things from the books, but honestly, that felt like the only rational choice possible I would have cut even more, as sometimes it still feels like they were trying to show us too many things without having enough time to tie them up together nicely.
The only thing that really felt off was Dumbledore acting so much out of character. He changed so much it felt distracting, was he on drugs or something?
Harry needs a hair cut
Good HP movie but not my favourite one.
The tournament offers some great set pieces. The trio are getting older and dealing with teenage problems is fun. The return of Voldemort is a fantastic scene, Ralph Fiennes is perfect. The only bad things about this movie is the pacing, it drags at times, and Harry's hair.
My favourite Harry Potter movie. I love the extension of characters we see in this one, especially love the Yule Ball scene and of course the actual tournament scenes.
Probably my favorite of the books next to the 3rd one. As a movie it never pops in my head as one of the best of the films. However it probably should. Since you have the chilling resurrection of Lord Voldemort as well as Harry stuck playing many dangerous wizard games meant for older students.
My least favorite of the movies is the one that should have been the best and that's Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince.
love the last battle scene
Another good one.
Since this was one of my favorites of the Potter books, I hoped I would enjoy this a lot. Unfortunately, this movie didn't give me the same exciting feeling the book did. In fact, the movie seemed pretty pointless, as there were hardly any character or story developments (which were present in the book).
The only scene that saved this movie for me was the introduction of Lord Voldemort; he seemed to be a real bad guy with scary looks, a bad attitude and an evil mindset. That was great. The rest of the movie not so much..
What a film, a fantastical fourth film for the Harry Potter trilogy
As I recall, this one was one of my favourite Harry Potter movies but now this time I didn't find it that exceptional, I think I prefer the previous ones.
I could write a long review here about all the great, and important, parts from the story that are left out in the movie. But that has already been done before by some other reviews here.
Really the only thing that looks a bit like a story is the fact that Voldemort gets back to life with the help of a death eater at hogwarts.
All other extremely important things are left out. Things that are so important for the Harry Potter story line that i am terrified of how horrible the next movies will be with these things left out.
Last thing i will mention about his movie: why does the sun never shine throughout the entire movie? The thing i like about Harry Potter is that its fantasy that takes place in the real world. I've never seen a full year without 1 day that the sun shines. It gives the movie a sad look. Oh, and Dumbledore in this movie is an insult for the Harry Potter books.
Ron: "Do you think we'll ever just have a quiet year at Hogwarts?"
Hermione, Harry: "No."
Ron: "Yeah, didn't think so. Oh well, what's life without a few dragons?"
Everyone has long hair in this one for some reason. Goblet of Fire has always been my least favorite of the franchise mainly because of the sports tournament, it changes the recipe but i'd rather have another mystery adventure storyline like they usually do. What I like even less is the teen drama stuff and the dance subplot. It's still a good watch because of the characters who I adore. Brendan Gleeson is a great addition as Moody but the ones that shine the most (once again) are Alan Rickman and Maggie Smith. Pattinson's character doesn't get enough scenes before the third act. The Quidditch World Cup was so brief. The dragon chase, underwater scenes and the maze in the third act were all pretty thrilling. Last battle's epic and I love the set piece.
Magical Creatures Ranked (by favorite):
"ah, but that's why it's so brilliant!"
"because it's so pathetically dim witted."
i still can't not see edward cullen in this movie..... especially with his first scene being falling from above out of nowhere...
This should've been different. Very different.
The only characters I care about are the main characters of the series. It's no surprise that Viktor, Fleur, and Cedric become champions. You're introduced to them and the camera focuses on them so yeah no surprise there. Cedric is introduced and dies in the same movie. So nope - not emotionally invested in him.
Not much about this movie is enjoyable at all.
Still annoyed we didn't see (part of) the Quidditch World Cup match.
The Triwizard tournament is amazing, great to see new schools as well. Althought I find Harry a bit of a cheater when brooms aren't allowed and then he just accio's it in there.
The scene were Voldemort returns is scary as hell, the death of Cedric Diggory is so brutal and the "THAT'S MY BOY" scene is chilling.
Beautiful music, "Harry in Winter" being my favourite and the Hogwarts' March is epic.
It is probably my least favorite movie in the saga. I think the games and the Quidditch tournament are not well-utilized. Still, they finally give us Voldemort's presence at the end, which was already necessary.
like harry potter, i also procrastinate for weeks until someone just tells me the answers
My second favorite Harry Potter movie, right after Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets. I remember loving this movie as a kid and I'm glad the feeling still holds. For now, this is the last Harry Potter movie that has a top rating given by me, we'll see if I'll raise a rating of the ones I'm missing. Seeing this element of the franchise reminded me that there was a time when I really wanted this Funko figure, in honor of Cedric, one of the sadly and unfairly least explored characters in the wizarding world of Hogwarts. Maybe I'll finally buy it....
a movie that takes strides in terms of quality of writing and storytelling!
"No spell can reawaken the dead, Harry. I trust you know that. Dark and difficult times lie ahead. Soon we must all face the choice between what is right and what is easy"
Still love the idea of Wizard games, still cliché that the younger student is as good as the older ones, who had more education. Still love Brendan Gleeson's eye. Still really love Ralph Fiennes as the Dark Lord.
Fun rewatch. Halfway there and still having fun.
Nice but what a horrible tragedy at the end. RIP Cedric.
I love the light and happy beginning! The morning hike, traveling via a Portkey, the Quidditch worldcup, the magic tent, etc.
The Triwizard Tournament is an awesome idea (although definitely not a game for fun :o :D).
And of course lots of great moments! E.g.:
- Dumbledore enraged (multiple times)
- Fake Moody teaching Malfoy not to cowardly attack someone from the back
- Hermione with Harry in the tent xD
- Hermione: "And I said yes." (in response to Ron's stupid / last ressort invite)
Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire delivers a dark, adventure driven film full of magic and mystery. In this chapter of the saga Hogwarts hosts two visiting schools for the Tri-Wizard Tournament, in which a group of students are chosen to compete for “eternal glory” in three death-defying contests. The cast gets a bit stronger with the additions of Brendan Gleeson and David Tennant; Gleeson in particular injects a lot of fun and humor with his character of Mad-Eye Moody. Additionally, director Mike Newell is able to move the series into dark and dramatic territory while still retaining the magic and enchantment that made the series so compelling. Full of action, mystery, and terror, Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire is an exciting and thrilling film.
the movie by its own is not that bad, but comparing it with the book is horrible.
Needed to be 20min shorter.
Shocked how well this one is, this was when the series was taking a darker turn, and I love it.
This series goes darker and better every movie :heart:
My rating is 9.5
it's really a great movie
Script: 7
Deviates greatly from the book, and adds plenty of teenage love drama and a darker tone. Some of it has been made for a greater cinematic pleasure, but there are so changes that make little sense for those who haven't read the book.
Main cast: 6
Perfectly suitable but not particularly developed from previous films. Radcliffe still has trouble with emotional acting.
Supporting cast: 8
Highlights include Miranda Richardson as Skeeter, Roger Lloyd-Pack as Barty Crouch, and Ralph Fiennes as iconic villain Lord Voldemort.
Protagonist & antagonist: 7
While Harry enters his emo face that culminates in the next film, Voldemort rises again and feels like a real threat.
Production: 10
With darker vibes, the film sets the tone and style for the rest of the series and David Yates keeps the massive narrative well together. The design and sets also look great.
Post-production: 10
The CGI is believable, down to the first big dragon of the series. The music takes a darker turn while using familiar melodies.
Atmosphere: 9
Dark and menacing, it clearly marks a tonal shift for the series while also putting more emphasis on relationships and a more varied type of humor.
Pacing: 12
Despite its long runtime, it keeps up interest with humor, excitement and enough material from the book to keep fans engaged.
Expectations: 7
It stays true to the main plot of the book and manages to raise the feeling of coming danger, but it would have been nice to see less of the first third of the book cut.
Replay value: 9
One of the more solid and entertaining entries in the series. Easily fun to watch several times over.
Score: 85/120
For me the whole premise of Harry participating in the Triwiazard Tournament somehow felt too forced. I'm getting the feeling these movies won't become my new favorite series..
Tournament time for Harry, Ron and Hermione, as their beloved Hogwart's Academy plays host to a high-stakes wizarding competition and an influx of students from two international schools. It also represents childhood's end, in a way, as mortal stakes are raised and the trio begin to take an interest in members of the opposite sex.
The series has grown considerably darker this time around, and in more than just a thematic sense. All around the school, formerly bustling with life, the colors feel drained and lights extinguished. It's a chilly, drab-looking film, apart from a few splashy moments during the action scenes, lacking the bits of good-natured whimsy that had typified the franchise to this point. Many, many threads from the novel are completely omitted, which makes sense as it's a seven-hundred page tome and would not have easily fit into a feature-length window, but those remaining points lack a sense of cohesion. Rather than speckled segments of a greater whole, they play like mix-and-match dashes of half-told sidetracks; a shifting, unfocused narrative that nearly serves as a jumbo-sized montage.
The broader saga takes some important steps this time around, with Voldemort finally making an in-the-flesh appearance and Harry working his way through some particularly sticky situations. We add a few important supporting players, too, although that seems to come at the expense of the core trio. Ron and Hermione are relegated to second (or third) fiddles, and the film sorely misses that sense of camaraderie as their mutual society approaches an existential crisis.
A tricky episode to rate, one which could have been excellent with a bit more focus and room to breathe, but also may have been nearly unwatchable at the proper length. We're finally moving somewhere consequential, at any rate.
A darker turn for this series:
http://reading-rebel.blogspot.com/2017/10/movie-review-harry-potter-and-goblet-of.html
My poor of all... just tried too much... cheesy in parts... some of the cast i don't like.. didn't fit.. a rush... but i'm gonna give it a fair coz it's watchable, and some parts were okay... and you learn more of the story...
rewatch | Always pisses me off how to piss taken at the beginning. Tennant as Crouch Jr. is amazing! How and Hermione in a dress ballroom.
Though it in no way compares to the book, this movie was exciting and funny. It is probably my favorite of the series of films.
Shout by KatnerysBlockedParent2018-09-11T13:18:15Z— updated 2018-10-12T09:25:48Z
It's a shame that we didn't see a lot more of the Quidditch World Cup and the Triwizard Tournament, these parts were rushed. However, the conclusion with Lord Voldemort was really good and Ralph Fiennes didn't disappoint.