"Beg your pardon, forgot to knock."
GoldenEye will always remain one of my favorite Bond movies. It is special to me because it was the first Bond film I ever saw as a kid and the videogame on the N64 that came along with it was one me and my friends played the shit out of. So many fun memories!
Pierce Brosnan's first outing as James Bond still stands the test of time for me and throw in Sean Bean as a bad guy and it can't go wrong. I love the scene with the tank and Izabella Scorupco as Natalya is still one of my favorite Bond girls.
Rewatching GoldenEye was another fun ride and a great way to start a free saturday!
“GoldenEye” is a 1995 film based on the James Bond series. It features Pierce Brosnan, who plays the fictional MI6 character for the first time.
Ah, “GoldenEye”... This film has a very special place in my heart, as Pierce Brosnan is personally my favorite actor to play Bond. I believe I watched “GoldenEye” and the majority of Bond films before when I was a lot younger, but this most recent rewatch is the first time I’ve watched it from start to finish.
Brosnan as Bond was, simply, a great match. His wit, charm, and charisma made the film so fun and enjoyable to watch. Izabella Scorupco, the actress who plays the female lead, was... alright? I don’t really have much to say about her other than that it felt like she was made a “Bond Girl” out of pure convenience. I also don’t have much of an opinion on Sean Bean, the actor who plays the main antagonist. I think the true star of the film was Famke Janssen, the actress who plays Xenia Onatopp, the henchwoman. Onatopp is honestly iconic (name included!). I’m pretty sure that it wasn’t intended to so, but the sheer absurdity of Onatopp’s... passionate way of killing always made me laugh. I think what impressed me the most was how well and how much Janssen committed to the role. I truly loved her character.
I can’t say the same for the plot though. It was forgettable, but made somewhat interesting to watch by the action scenes.
No music stood out to me this time either.
I think I’d rewatch this film solely for how well Brosnan and Janssen did, and nothing more.
Pretty good, the action's really well done.
It's got a drifting tank, what else could you wish for?
And Famke Janssen's really good in it, she nails her one character trait of being extremely horny all the time.
The plot itself is all right, it can be a little silly sometimes.
So much to like here... but nothing is ever near-perfect in Bond-land.
The casting first of all. Brosnan is the face I see when I imagine Bond. He has the roughness of Connery, is the perfect age, is a very good actor. He sells himself as Bond in the first few moments and you find yourself asking "Moore? Lazenby? Dalton.... who?"
The plot is an interesting one. It's clearly a film left over from the Dalton days that has had the recent computer craze added in to it. It works on the whole but that is more for the use of 006 and the fiery Famke Janssen than anything else. The Alan Cummings character is an enjoyable comedic foil that owes a ot to the Moore years but it just about works.
The downsides... The music - awful electronic stuff that makes a Cold War looking film sound like it is in the wrong era. The budget feels smaller as the whole thing looks a little cheap - some dodgy use of stock footage doesn't help there. (I'm sure something was going on with MGM in the 6 years between films that contributed to that penny-pinching)
What I will say though is that this film offers up Pierce Brosnan as the heir apparent to Sean Connery and promises that he has the skills and talents to be the best Bond ever... If they give him the films.
What a refreshing surprise and a fantastic debut from Brosnan.
7.75/10
Oh, yes, that's more like it. This Bond has a great mix of humor, brutality, a dose of silliness plus tons of action. Brosnan instantly steps into the role of Bond and it feels like he's always been there. The tone of the movie is at times really grim and you sometimes feel you watch Rambo instead of Bond.
But I really need to do something about my memory. I had no recollection of Famke Jansen being in a Bond movie nor that Judy Dench has already been there with Brosnan. And she does a fine job giving us a very different kind of "M". And by that I don't speak of her sex. Famke was great also and she seems to have had a lot of fun with this role.
The theme song by the amazing, and sadly recently passed, Tina Turner is one of the best of the franchise and stands in stark contrast to the at times silly synth music used for the film.
One little weakness in the plot was that you don't believe for a second that Alec is dead simply by the fact you don't hire Sean Bean for a little teaser appearance. And since he then doesn't appear until later in the movie it's a safe bet he's the villain.
But like I said, little weakness. Overall a highly entertaining Bond movie.
Finally made it to a Bond film released after my birth. Feels like a long while since I could last say that I've watched more than one great Bond flicks consecutively but here we are. Top notch action and characters. A Bond adventure that's part evolved for the post-Cold War era, yet still mostly familiar to 007's Cold War escapades. Although I do have to ask... why isn't Alan Cumming's more mocked alongside other oddities/hilarities belonging to this franchise? Somehow managing to sound more like a foreigner putting on a Scots accent rather than the other way around.
the first Bond of the Brosnan era, with a James Bond that exudes seduction and elegance, good action in a good movie
The first and likely best of the Pierce Brosnan Bond movies. I remember thinking that Brosnan would make the perfect Bond back after Roger Moore started receiving the senior discount at Denny's. Unfortunately, contract conflicts necessitated the need to sign on the Shakespearean but stiff Timothy Dalton for a while. Once that was over, we got Brosnan to play 007 for a while.
Brosnan was slick and athletic and did a great job playing Bond. He's third on my list of best Bonds right after Connery and Craig (yeah, it's sad that I've personally ranked them). After a few movies, Brosnan seemed a little bored but for "Goldeneye" he was spot on. Maybe he is a little slight for all the brawling he is called upon to do, but when he busts through that brick wall driving the Russian tank, it's as cool of a Bond moment as any.
The final battle with Bean (Sean Bean as baddie Alec Trevelyan) is a bit long and way over the top, but it's quite an action scene. I liked Famke Janssen as hench woman Xenia Onatopp, too. I've never seen her play a character like that before.
This is a solid James Bond adventure and certainly did a lot for the future of 007 movies. It's too bad "Die Another Day" practically killed the franchise a few years later.
Blimey, what a stunning James Bond movie this one is. It goes at such a rollicking pace, there is never a dull moment.
Before I watched any of these films I thought I'd prefer Timothy Dalton to Pierce Brosnan, but I've got to say I think Pierce Brosnan is the better Bond. Still not as good as Sean Connery or Roger Moore, but surprisingly better than Timothy Dalton.
I absolutely love the scene where James Bond is driving a tank. It's madcap, but ridiculously cool and the right side of daft.
The Bond girl is also excellent here. I really like Izabella Scorupco as Natalia. She's shown to be an extremely intelligent and resourceful computer programmer, who assists Bond in the technical side of things whilst James Bond deals with the spy stuff.
And isn't it fun that we get an evil rogue former spy of MI6 here, in Alec 006? It's a really fun idea to introduce somebody who used to work for MI6 but feels betrayed by them and Bond because of a failed mission in the past. He feels like the perfect foil to James Bond!
The first and likely best of the Pierce Brosnan Bond movies. I remember thinking that Brosnan would make the perfect Bond back after Roger Moore started receiving the senior discount at Denny's. Unfortunately, contract conflicts necessitated the need to sign on the Shakespearean but stiff Timothy Dalton for a while. Once that was over, we got Brosnan to play 007 for a while.
Brosnan was slick and athletic and did a great job playing Bond. He's third on my list of best Bonds right after Connery and Craig (yeah, it's sad that I've personally ranked them). After a few movies, Brosnan seemed a little bored but for "Goldeneye" he was spot on. Maybe he is a little slight for all the brawling he is called upon to do, but when he busts through that brick wall driving the Russian tank, it's as cool of a Bond moment as any.
The final battle with Bean (Sean Bean as baddie Alec Trevelyan) is a bit long and way over the top, but it is quite an action scene. I liked Famke Janssen as henchwoman Xenia Onatopp, too. I've never seen her play a character like that before.
This is a solid James Bond adventure and certainly did a lot for the future of 007 movies. It's too bad "Die Another Day" practically killed the franchise a few years later.
Very good first outing of Pierce Brosnan as Bond. He is the Bond I grew up with and he is just so good in the role. Also love the title track by Tina Turner and Judi Dench as M.
Pierce Brosnan's debut behind the martini glass is easily the best Bond movie since Sean Connery first quit the role, nearly thirty years prior. Everything just seems to click for Brosnan, who deftly balances the tricky contrast between suave, romantic espionage and blunt, campy excess while still, somehow, seeming cool and in-command. He's familiar but replenished, a character we've grown to appreciate over the course of sixteen preceding films, cast in a new light. No growing pains whatsoever - this agent hits the ground running.
The plot's emphasis on post-Soviet decay provides a long-sought modern backdrop to the series (at the time of its release, at least), while opening the door for all sorts of fresh concepts, unique characters and fascinating set pieces. Bond's fleeting showdown with an ex-comrade (Sean Bean, in a fantastic villainous turn) amid a cluster of stylish, discarded Russian monuments is a particular standout in that respect.
It's not perfect, by any means - the tech bits are laughable, the timeline's a mess, it's overly long - but it's undeniably fun to watch, colorful and edgy and hip, and a decided return to form for a series that had been floating, directionless, for quite a while. A new cornerstone, just where one was most desperately needed.
That tank scene is crazy. Pierce Brosnan does a good James Bond. Sean Bean is always a great villain.
After years of silliness and fake-hero we finally got a great James Bond movie in every aspects:
opening;
song (Tina Turner nail it);
spy story;
villain (which gives some light to old 00-agents);
a great and memorable villain henchman;
an unforgettable bond-girl (not with just looks but has character and attitude... for me here we got one of the all time best ones);
a great James Bond (one with a new presence but also really well sumarizing all of his predecessors actors - and also the best Pierce Brosnan Bond movie);
really entertaiment;
Awesome!
8/10
To me, this balances what makes a perfect Bond film, well, perfectly. It doesn't do anything terribly unbelievable, but at the same time it knows when to have a little fun with the classic 007 tropes. Pierce isn't my favorite Bond in the franchise or anything, but I do still think he does a good job. You get both playful remarks from him as well as serious anger and sadness when it makes sense.
The villain, the Bond girl, and all the henchmen are also fantastic in this one. I like Sean Bean in just about everything, and his henchwoman Xenia Onatopp (Onatopp? On a top.) is so entertaining in every scene she's got. Let's not forget about Judi Dench as the new M though. She has very little screen time, but she owns that character right out of the gate. Glad we'll see her from many more films.
Oh, not sure if you've heard, but they made this video game based on this too. Might want to check it out if you have time.
I didn't see Goldeneye until after I had been playing the Nintendo 64 video game for about 4-5 years. Therefore, on first viewing I think I was so mesmerized with seeing the set pieces from the game in real life, that it clouded my judgement.
This is still the best Brosnan Bond film and at times it is entertaining, but it's a bit of a mess. I think with a new actor playing the famous role, the filmmakers felt compelled to shoehorn Bondisms into almost every scene. That works sometimes, others it comes across as lame. 5/10.
This is such a daft film, lots of really rusty puns and over the top action sequences. I loved it
Film really badly shot, with relatively cheap special effects, long periods when very little happens (even compared to the prior films in the series), and less sarcasm, as well as a Bond completely out of character.
The James Bond Films
1 Eon films
1.1 Dr. No (1962) https://trakt.tv/movies/dr-no-1962
1.2 From Russia with Love (1963) https://trakt.tv/movies/from-russia-with-love-1963
1.3 Goldfinger (1964) https://trakt.tv/movies/goldfinger-1964
1.4 Thunderball (1965) https://trakt.tv/movies/thunderball-1965
1.5 You Only Live Twice (1967) https://trakt.tv/movies/you-only-live-twice-1967
1.6 On Her Majesty's Secret Service (1969) https://trakt.tv/movies/on-her-majesty-s-secret-service-1969
1.7 Diamonds Are Forever (1971) https://trakt.tv/movies/diamonds-are-forever-1971
1.8 Live and Let Die (1973) https://trakt.tv/movies/live-and-let-die-1973
1.9 The Man with the Golden Gun (1974) https://trakt.tv/movies/the-man-with-the-golden-gun-1974
1.10 The Spy Who Loved Me (1977) https://trakt.tv/movies/the-spy-who-loved-me-1977
1.11 Moonraker (1979) https://trakt.tv/movies/moonraker-1979
1.12 For Your Eyes Only (1981) https://trakt.tv/movies/for-your-eyes-only-1981
1.13 Octopussy (1983) https://trakt.tv/movies/octopussy-1983
1.14 A View to a Kill (1985) https://trakt.tv/movies/a-view-to-a-kill-1985
1.15 The Living Daylights (1987) https://trakt.tv/movies/the-living-daylights-1987
1.16 Licence to Kill (1989) https://trakt.tv/movies/licence-to-kill-1989
1.17 GoldenEye (1995) https://trakt.tv/movies/goldeneye-1995
1.18 Tomorrow Never Dies (1997) https://trakt.tv/movies/tomorrow-never-dies-1997
1.19 The World Is Not Enough (1999) https://trakt.tv/movies/the-world-is-not-enough-1999
1.20 Die Another Day (2002) https://trakt.tv/movies/die-another-day-2002
1.21 Casino Royale (2006) https://trakt.tv/movies/casino-royale-2006
1.22 Quantum of Solace (2008) https://trakt.tv/movies/quantum-of-solace-2008
1.23 Skyfall (2012) https://trakt.tv/movies/skyfall-2012
1.24 Spectre (2015) https://trakt.tv/movies/spectre-2015
1.25 No Time to Die (2021) https://trakt.tv/movies/no-time-to-die-2021
2 Non-Eon films
2.1 Casino Royale (1967) https://trakt.tv/movies/casino-royale-1967
2.2 Never Say Never Again (1983) https://trakt.tv/movies/never-say-never-again-1983
old james bond movies are a classic though!! not as our current one but still they are so enjoyable and fun to watch!
Pierce Brosnan resurrects the Bond franchise in GoldenEye. The story follows James Bond as he investigates the destruction of a Russian satellite station that was believed to have developed a super weapon. Brosnan was born to be Bond, and does an excellent job portraying the character; keeping him suave and charming, but also tough and dangerous. Sean Bean also gives an impressive performance; crafting one of the most challenging and personal villains that Bond has ever faced. However, the Bond girls don't quite work, and the theme song is terrible. Still, the plot is fairly tight and the action scenes are energetic and exciting. GoldenEye is a fun and action packed adventure with a new Bond for a post-Cold War era.
Pierce Brosnan's best James Bond movie. The only thing I don't like in this really decent flick are the thousands of bullets that all miss Bond (a fact that annoys me even more in Brosnan's following movies).
Review by benoliver999BlockedParentSpoilers2015-08-16T08:44:30Z
A slew of legal troubles behind the scenes led to a six year gap between Bond films. As a result, Timothy Dalton resigned and Pierce Brosnan was brought in to take the helm (the man originally intended to step in for Roger Moore were it not for other contractual obligations).
The fall of the Berlin wall has changed the face of world politics since the last film. Bond, although never directly involved with America’s struggle against Russia, is very much a product of the Cold War. That’s all over now, leading some to wonder if the franchise should end altogether.
This leaves the producers with an uphill struggle, trying make Bond relevant and interesting in a age where the very core of the character has been dissolved.
Instead of dodging the issue, GoldenEye tackles it head on.
In 1986 007 is sent on a mission with 006 (Sean Bean) to destroy a Russian military facility. 006 is captured and Bond leaves him for dead in his escape. Years later we rejoin Bond on a mission to follow a member of a crime syndicate. He uncovers a plot to steal an EMP weapon from the Russians, fronted by his ex-colleague.
One would expect GoldenEye to try something radically different in its attempts to appeal to a 1995 audience, and yet the exact opposite happens. This is almost a ‘back to basics’ for Bond, not quite harking back to Dr. No but almost. The women, the action & the gadgets are all there, but somehow it all feels revitalised.
Instead of a completely new idea, the producers opted for a subtle shift in tone. This is a deft move; it keeps the fans happy while helping to bring the franchise into the 21st century.
At the forefront of this change is Judi Dench as M. She gets a small but key role in establishing some of the much needed self-awareness GoldenEye exhibits. She’s cold towards Bond and shows disdain towards him, famously saying “…I think you’re a sexist, misogynist dinosaur. A relic of the Cold War…”. This is something that needed to be said before we could move on; Bond has been getting away with this crap for sixteen films now…
There are lots of new elements brought in behind the scenes too, notably the new director Martin Campbell. He is confident and makes the big action scenes stick. He has a way of bringing us into the moment through close attention to detail. The close-ups of the actors match the wide-shots exactly, despite being shot in two completely different studios. We never feel like we are about to sit back and watch a stunt man do his thing for ten minutes.
Brosnan is also a welcome addition. He is intense but not without a sense of humour, and seems more involved in a lot of the stunt work. He also manages to convey a situational awareness sometimes lacking in the others; it looks like he’s actually thinking about the plot and what he’s supposed to be doing, rather than just ‘do I look cool?’.
He’s helped out by some talented writing. Every character in GoldenEye serves some purpose and no-one is forgettable. Alan Cummings as Boris the computer hacker, Robbie Coltrane as the Russian gangster, Famke Janssen as the crazy thigh-squeezing killer Xenia Onatopp… the list goes on. If you’ve seen the film, you know who I am talking about. This probably hasn’t been the case since Goldfinger (where you know the characters even if you haven’t seen the film…).
Ironically enough the dullest character is the one most central to the plot - Sean Bean’s Alec Trevelyan.
GoldenEye is a promising start to a new era. It somehow breaks new ground on an idea that began in a very different time, whilst being every bit as entertaining and exciting as the best of them.
http://benoliver999.com/film/2015/08/15/goldeneye/